-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Address FN involving CAP remote flow sources #222
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Address FN involving CAP remote flow sources #222
Conversation
…ervice` - Extension to definitions: - Add an explicit case named `ExportedClosureApplicationServiceDefinition` of a `UserDefinedApplicationService` that is defined in the form of an exported function whose first parameter represents the service instance. - Add a definition `ServiceInstanceFromExportedClosureParameter` that matches above class. - Bug fixes: - Address a bug in the `UserDefinedApplicationService.isExposed/0` where a simple negation also captured cases where CDS declarations were missing. - Address a bug in the `HandlerParameterOfExposedService` where the trailing `.getCdsDeclaration()` was missing. NOTE: See issue #221 to learn more about the `HACK` block comment.
* This class captures the `srv` parameter of the exported arrow function. Also see | ||
* `ServiceInstanceFromImplMethodCallClosureParameter` which is similar to this. | ||
*/ | ||
class ServiceInstanceFromExportedClosureParameter extends ServiceInstance { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should this also extend ParameterNode
like ServiceInstanceFromImplMethodCallClosureParameter
does? not too sure if its really necessary/makes anything easier predicate availability wise tho
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addressed in 6514387.
overall this looks really good to me! couple of small extra things
|
@knewbury01 Additional cases are added to |
What This PR Contributes
This PR fixes false negative cases where the current CAP remote flow source definition
UserProvidedPropertyReadOfHandlerParameterOfExposedService
is missing detections from the code that comes in the following form:Two things are notable in the above case:
Unfortunately, the CodeQL Standard Library for JavaScript cannot detect the above
(srv) => { srv.on(...) }
element due to some limitations (see issue #221). Therefore, we directly describe the above patternmodule.exports = (...) => { ... }
as a hack around it.Other than that, the code changes include:
ExportedClosureApplicationServiceDefinition
of aUserDefinedApplicationService
that is defined in the form of an exported function whose first parameter represents the service instance.ServiceInstanceFromExportedClosureParameter
that matches above class.UserDefinedApplicationService.isExposed/0
where a simple negation also captured cases where CDS declarations were missing.HandlerParameterOfExposedService
where the trailing.getCdsDeclaration()
was missing.Future Works
Remove the "hack around it" once the relevant portion of the library is patched and released.