Skip to content

Conversation

@jamesmckinna
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #2871 .

@jamesmckinna
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JacquesCarette hopefully we can merge now, if you're happy with the latest round of tweaks.

As with my updated comment on #2871 I could imagine this getting refactored as part of a development of Kernels... but downstream!

Copy link
Contributor

@JacquesCarette JacquesCarette left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still disagree about the name / placement of the module, but most definitely not willing to die on that hill! So I won't stand in the way of what is otherwise progress.

@JacquesCarette JacquesCarette added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into agda:master with commit b8ce24b Nov 21, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[ add ] Relation.Binary.Morphism.Construct.On

3 participants