Skip to content

docs: include-tool-results-in-member-responses #535

Open
ashpreetbedi wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
includ-tool-results-in-member-responses
Open

docs: include-tool-results-in-member-responses #535
ashpreetbedi wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
includ-tool-results-in-member-responses

Conversation

@ashpreetbedi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Describe key changes, mention related issues or motivation for the changes.

Note: Your PR title must follow conventional commit format (e.g., docs: add auth guide, fix: correct broken links, style: update formatting). See CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (errors, broken links, outdated info)
  • New content
  • Content improvement
  • Other: ____

Related Issues/PRs (if applicable)

  • Closes #____
  • Related SDK PR: agno-agi/agno#____

Checklist

  • Content is accurate and up-to-date
  • All links tested and working
  • Code examples verified (if applicable)
  • Spelling and grammar checked
  • Screenshots updated (if applicable)

@shaloo shaloo force-pushed the includ-tool-results-in-member-responses branch from 1705a16 to 828e12e Compare February 27, 2026 11:22
@shaloo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

shaloo commented Feb 27, 2026

Merge approvals, schedules changes from the main branch before reviewing this commit.

@shaloo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

shaloo commented Feb 27, 2026

reference files should ideally be updated via API ref re-generation at build time. These generated files should not be checked into the repo sources. Thoughts? @ysolanky

@shaloo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

shaloo commented Feb 27, 2026

Also, docs.json needs to be updated here - not sure why it wasn't in the first place. Just checking before adding it in docs.json file.

context/team/overview
context/team/filter-....
context/team/includ-...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants