Skip to content

Conversation

tedzhouhk
Copy link
Contributor

@tedzhouhk tedzhouhk commented Aug 19, 2025

Overview:

Details:

Where should the reviewer start?

Related Issues: (use one of the action keywords Closes / Fixes / Resolves / Relates to)

  • closes GitHub issue: #xxx

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated repository ownership for Python-related changes by adding an additional maintainer to the ownership list. This streamlines code review responsibilities and improves maintainability.
    • No user-facing functionality, behavior, or performance is affected by this update.
    • No impact on configuration, settings, or usage.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 19, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated CODEOWNERS to add hhzhang16 as a code owner for Python (*.py) files. All other ownership rules remain unchanged.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
Repository governance
CODEOWNERS
Added hhzhang16 to the Python (*.py) owners line; no other sections modified.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A hop and a tap in the CODEOWNERS glade,
New paws join the Python brigade.
hhzhang16, welcome to the warren’s flow—
Where .py paths bloom and reviews now grow.
Thump-thump! says the rabbit, “Changes small,
But now we share the watch for all.”

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CODEOWNERS (1)

11-11: Confirm desired scope: later directory rules override the *.py rule, so @hhzhang16 won’t own Python files in some folders.

GitHub CODEOWNERS applies “last matching rule wins.” Because several directory-specific rules appear after Line 11, they will shadow the *.py owners for files inside those directories:

  • Line 14: /container/ — does not include @hhzhang16 (so Python files here won’t include them)
  • Line 17: /deploy/ — already includes @hhzhang16 (good)
  • Line 20: /examples/ — does not include @hhzhang16 (so Python files here won’t include them), except where:
    • Line 21: /examples/*/deploy/ — includes @hhzhang16
    • Line 22: /examples/multimodal/ — includes @hhzhang16

If the intent is for @hhzhang16 to be a code owner for all Python files repo-wide, consider either:

  • Adding @hhzhang16 to the later directory rules that should also include them (e.g., /container/, /examples/), or
  • Adding more specific Python patterns after those directory entries (e.g., /examples/**/*.py … @hhzhang16, /container/**/*.py … @hhzhang16) so they take precedence.

Also, please confirm @hhzhang16 has at least read access to the repo; otherwise GitHub won’t request their review.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cae5822 and d13beff.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Mirror Repository to GitLab
  • GitHub Check: Build and Test - dynamo

@tedzhouhk tedzhouhk merged commit 26d9f15 into main Aug 19, 2025
13 checks passed
@tedzhouhk tedzhouhk deleted the hzhou/add-planner-codeown branch August 19, 2025 21:39
hhzhang16 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2025
nv-anants pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants