Chore: add new test using source-pokeapi and custom components.py
#317
Conversation
aaronsteers
changed the title
source-pokeapi and custom components.py
|
/autofix
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce a new integration for the Pokémon API using custom components and update the associated test suite. Two custom component modules are added—one for normal execution and one to simulate failure—along with a new declarative manifest and configuration file. In parallel, obsolete files related to The Guardian API (including README, components, manifest, and configuration files) have been removed. Additionally, test functions have been refactored to remove the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant T as Test Runner
participant H as _read_fn
participant S as Source Integration
participant C as Custom Component
T->>H: Initiate sync process
H->>S: Request data extraction
alt Successful extraction
S->>C: Invoke extraction logic
C-->>S: Return records
else Failing extraction
S->>C: Invoke extraction logic
C-->>S: Raise IntentionalException
end
S-->>H: Deliver messages or error
H-->>T: Provide output
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Tip 🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (13)
unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/components_failing.py (3)
19-24: LGTM! Well-structured implementation for testing error scenarios.The implementation effectively simulates failure scenarios with proper type hints and clear method override.
Hey, would you like to add a docstring to the
extract_recordsmethod explaining its purpose? For example:def extract_records( self, response: requests.Response, ) -> Iterable[MutableMapping[Any, Any]]: + """Override to simulate failure by raising IntentionalException.""" raise IntentionalExceptionwdyt?
15-16: Consider sharing the exception class.Since this exception class is identical to the one in
components.py, should we consider moving it to a shared module? wdyt?
19-24: Consider adding return type hint to extract_records?The implementation looks good for testing failure scenarios! Would you consider adding a return type hint to make the code more maintainable, wdyt?
def extract_records( self, response: requests.Response, - ) -> Iterable[MutableMapping[Any, Any]]: + ) -> Iterable[MutableMapping[str, Any]]: raise IntentionalExceptionunit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/test_source_declarative_w_custom_components.py (3)
276-285: LGTM! Clean refactoring of message reading logic.The helper function
_read_fnnicely encapsulates the message reading logic, improving code readability.Hey, would you like to add a docstring to the
_read_fnhelper function? For example:def _read_fn(*args, **kwargs): + """Helper function to read and validate messages from the source.""" msg_iterator = source.read( logger=logging.getLogger(), config=py_components_config_dict, catalog=configured_catalog, state=None, ) for msg in msg_iterator: assert msg returnwdyt?
276-285: Consider adding docstring to the helper function.The helper function
_read_fnencapsulates message reading logic nicely. Should we add a docstring to explain its purpose? wdyt?
276-291: Consider extracting the read function to improve reusability?The
_read_fnhelper looks good! Would you consider extracting it to a standalone function to improve reusability across test cases, wdyt?+def read_messages(source: ManifestDeclarativeSource, config: dict, catalog: ConfiguredAirbyteCatalog) -> None: + msg_iterator = source.read( + logger=logging.getLogger(), + config=config, + catalog=catalog, + state=None, + ) + for msg in msg_iterator: + assert msgunit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/manifest.yaml (6)
976-980: Consider defining a more specific schema for Pokemon data.The current schema allows any properties without validation. Would you like to define specific properties that you expect from the PokeAPI response? This would help catch data structure changes early.
For example:
schemas: pokemon: type: object $schema: http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema# - properties: {} + properties: + id: + type: integer + description: The unique identifier of the Pokemon + name: + type: string + description: The name of the Pokemon + base_experience: + type: integer + description: The base experience gained for defeating this Pokemon + height: + type: integer + description: The height of this Pokemon in decimetres + weight: + type: integer + description: The weight of this Pokemon in hectograms additionalProperties: truewdyt?
37-38: Consider using HTTPS for the base URL.The base URL is using HTTP. Would you like to update it to use HTTPS for better security?
- url_base: https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemon + url_base: https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemonwdyt?
36-38: Consider adding rate limiting.Since we're using a public API, should we add rate limiting configuration to be a good API citizen? wdyt?
43-960: Consider organizing Pokemon names.The Pokemon list is comprehensive but quite long. Should we consider moving it to a separate file for better maintainability? wdyt?
962-980: Consider defining schema properties.The schema allows additional properties but has no defined properties. Should we define some common Pokemon properties for better documentation? wdyt?
975-980: Consider adding schema properties for better type safety?The schema looks minimal. Would you consider adding properties to define the expected structure of Pokemon data, wdyt? This could help catch data inconsistencies early.
pokemon: type: object $schema: http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema# - properties: {} + properties: + id: + type: integer + name: + type: string + height: + type: integer + weight: + type: integer + base_experience: + type: integer additionalProperties: trueunit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/components.py (1)
14-20: Consider adding type hints to improve code clarity?The class looks good! Would you consider adding type hints to make the code more maintainable, wdyt?
-class MyCustomExtractor(DpathExtractor): +class MyCustomExtractor(DpathExtractor[Any, Any]):
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/README.md(1 hunks)unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/components.py(1 hunks)unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/components_failing.py(1 hunks)unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/manifest.yaml(1 hunks)unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/valid_config.yaml(1 hunks)unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_the_guardian_api/.gitignore(0 hunks)unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_the_guardian_api/README.md(0 hunks)unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_the_guardian_api/components.py(0 hunks)unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_the_guardian_api/components_failing.py(0 hunks)unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_the_guardian_api/manifest.yaml(0 hunks)unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_the_guardian_api/valid_config.yaml(0 hunks)unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/test_source_declarative_w_custom_components.py(5 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)
- unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_the_guardian_api/valid_config.yaml
- unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_the_guardian_api/README.md
- unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_the_guardian_api/.gitignore
- unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_the_guardian_api/components.py
- unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_the_guardian_api/manifest.yaml
- unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_the_guardian_api/components_failing.py
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/README.md
- unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/valid_config.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/components_failing.py (2)
1-13: LGTM! Well-organized imports with copyright notice.The imports are comprehensive and properly organized.
19-24: LGTM! Clear failing behavior implementation.The failing behavior is implemented in a straightforward way by raising the exception.
unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/test_source_declarative_w_custom_components.py (3)
89-117: LGTM! Clean config function update.The function has been simplified by removing the
needs_secretsparameter, making it more focused.
287-291: LGTM! Clear error handling.The error handling is straightforward and matches the expected behavior.
89-117: LGTM! Clean refactor of the configuration function.The function has been simplified by removing the
needs_secretsparameter and updating the connector directory path. The implementation is clean and well-structured.unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/manifest.yaml (2)
10-34: LGTM! Well-structured stream definition.The stream definition is clear with proper references and configurations.
1-39: LGTM! Well-structured stream configuration.The stream configuration is clean and properly references the custom components. The base URL and path configuration look good.
unit_tests/source_declarative_manifest/resources/source_pokeapi_w_components_py/components.py (1)
10-11: LGTM! Clear and purposeful exception class.The docstring clearly explains the purpose of this exception class.
aaronsteers
changed the title
source-pokeapi and custom components.pysource-pokeapi and custom components.py
Resolves: https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte-internal-issues/issues/11582
Adds a modified version of
source-pokeapi. This leverages a customcomponents.pyfile without changing any behavior. This removes the need for the creds that previously were needed by ourthe-guardian-apitest that this one replaces.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores
Tests