-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move Activation Copy to Separate Module-AAP-42215 #416
Conversation
After we introduced the usage of the proxy profile in ansible#414, we didn't include the same profile in the `down` command. This leaves behind the squid service as well as its container, when they should all be removed when `docker compose down` is issued.
b2f7927
to
c082010
Compare
@B-Whitt are we planning to remove the existing copy functionality from the rulebook_activation module in a different PR, and also change the integration tests accordingly? |
@kaiokmo |
A new module is created for the copy action to copy the activation.
It has been discussed and decided that we shall move the existing copy action from the activation module to a separate module. The copy action shall take only one parameter which is the name of the copied activation. The resulting activation should be in disabled state. [https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AAP-42215]