-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
docs: fix misspelling of postprocess in examples #4488
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
# --------------------- | ||
# Once you have completed the fault tolerate meshing workflow, you can solve and | ||
# postprcess the results. | ||
# postprocess the results. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @Gobot1234.
We supposedly have a safety net to prevent this but based on recent PRs, it isn't being applied effectively.
N.b. previous line has "the fault tolerate meshing workflow".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue is that vale is only part of our documentation, so it checks only the doc
directory. Overall the codebase is checked by code-spell but it seems to ignore comments and docstrings although it is configured correctly only. I will try to figure out the exact issue and let everyone know.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Gobot1234 The above correction would be fault-tolerant
No description provided.