refactor: replace custom isNil utility with lodash-es isNil#9479
refactor: replace custom isNil utility with lodash-es isNil#9479zzjiaxiang wants to merge 7 commits intoant-design:masterfrom
Conversation
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:M
Summary of ChangesHello @zzjiaxiang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on refactoring the codebase by replacing custom utility functions with their Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough将多个文件中对本地 Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the codebase to use isNil from lodash-es instead of a custom utility, which is a good move for consistency and leveraging a standard library. The changes also include replacing typeof x === 'string' checks with isString from lodash-es. While this is a good refactoring, I've found a subtle bug introduced in SimpleContent.tsx where the new isString check doesn't account for empty strings, leading to a change in rendering behavior. Please see my comments for details and suggestions for a fix. The rest of the changes look good.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@src/layout/components/AppsLogoComponents/SimpleContent.tsx`:
- Around line 29-31: The current check in SimpleContent (where it renders <div
id="avatarLogo">{symbol}</div>) uses !logo && isString(title) which allows an
empty string title and renders an empty avatar; restore the original truthy
title guard so empty string is skipped by changing the condition to require a
non-empty string (e.g., !logo && isString(title) && title) before computing
symbol = title.substring(0, 1) and rendering avatarLogo.
|
冲突了，再来一下 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/field/components/Digit/index.tsx (1)
59-65:!isNil(val)条件冗余，可以移除在进入该
if块时，typeof val === 'number'已经保证val不为null或undefined，因此两处!isNil(val)检查是多余的，可一并删除以提升可读性。♻️ 建议的精简
- if ( - typeof val === 'number' && - !isNil(val) && - !isNil(fieldProps.precision) - ) { + if ( + typeof val === 'number' && + !isNil(fieldProps.precision) + ) {🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@src/field/components/Digit/index.tsx` around lines 59 - 65, The if condition that formats the numeric value is checking !isNil(val) redundantly because typeof val === 'number' already excludes null/undefined; update the conditional in the Digit component so it only verifies typeof val === 'number' and that fieldProps.precision is not nil (remove both !isNil(val) checks), leaving the Number(val.toFixed(fieldProps.precision)) logic unchanged.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@src/field/components/Digit/index.tsx`:
- Around line 59-65: The if condition that formats the numeric value is checking
!isNil(val) redundantly because typeof val === 'number' already excludes
null/undefined; update the conditional in the Digit component so it only
verifies typeof val === 'number' and that fieldProps.precision is not nil
(remove both !isNil(val) checks), leaving the
Number(val.toFixed(fieldProps.precision)) logic unchanged.
- Removed unnecessary nil checks for val in precision formatting. - Streamlined the condition to only check for number type and precision presence.
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
发布说明
Chores
Refactor