docs: Clarify that it is only the name of the field that is ignored #16052
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
logical-expr
|
Is the nullability of the field taken into account? |
It is for some cases (like |
alamb
changed the title
comphead
approved these changes
May 15, 2025
|
Thank you for the review @comphead and the catch @kylebarron |
brayanjuls
pushed a commit
to brayanjuls/arrow-datafusion
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2025
jfahne
pushed a commit
to jfahne/datafusion
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
return_field_from_args#16039Rationale for this change
return_field_from_args#16039What changes are included in this PR?
Clarify that the name is ignored, not the field
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?