chore: update environment variable references to use AWS_SDK_UA_APP_ID

[hjgraca]

Please provide the issue number

Issue number: #933

Summary

Changes

This pull request introduces a new constant, AWS_SDK_UA_APP_ID, to represent a unique application ID for the User-Agent header, replacing the previous use of AWS_EXECUTION_ENV in the codebase. The changes involve updating constants, interfaces, implementations, and test cases to reflect this new environment variable.

Key Changes:

Core Library Updates:

• Added a new constant AWSSdkUAAppId in Constants.cs to represent the AWS_SDK_UA_APP_ID environment variable. This constant is used throughout the library to replace AWS_EXECUTION_ENV.
• Updated the SetExecutionEnvironment method in IPowertoolsConfigurations and IPowertoolsEnvironment interfaces to use AWS_SDK_UA_APP_ID. [1] [2]
• Modified the SetExecutionEnvironment implementation in PowertoolsEnvironment.cs to set and retrieve the AWS_SDK_UA_APP_ID environment variable instead of AWS_EXECUTION_ENV.

Test Updates:

• Updated all test cases in various test files (BatchProcessingInternalTests.cs, PowertoolsEnvironmentTest.cs, IdempotentAspectTests.cs, PowertoolsLoggerTest.cs, MetricsTests.cs, XRayRecorderTests.cs) to validate behavior using AWS_SDK_UA_APP_ID instead of AWS_EXECUTION_ENV. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

Code Quality:

• Disabled ReSharper's InconsistentNaming rule in Constants.cs to accommodate naming conventions for constants.

User experience

Please share what the user experience looks like before and after this change

Checklist

Please leave checklist items unchecked if they do not apply to your change.

• Meets tenets criteria
• I have performed a self-review of this change
• Changes have been tested
• Changes are documented
• PR title follows conventional commit semantics

Is this a breaking change?

RFC issue number:

Checklist:

• Migration process documented
• Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.29%. Comparing base (c2711e2) to head (88fdaa3).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #934      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    77.31%   77.29%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          271      271              
  Lines        10839    10839              
  Branches      1277     1277              
===========================================
- Hits          8380     8378       -2     
- Misses        2043     2044       +1     
- Partials       416      417       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.