added part count validation for download request

[Fred1155]

Motivation and Context

For the part get request for S3 transfer manager, When a response is received, the S3 Transfer Manager MUST check the value of ContentRange and validate that it matches with the expected range for the specific part number. After all requests have been sent, we should validate that the total number of part GET requests sent matches with the expected PartsCount. This PR implements the validation.

Modifications

Added validation method in MultipartDownloaderSubscriber class

Testing

Added wiremock test for failed test

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
• Local run of mvn install succeeds
• My code follows the code style of this project
• My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
• I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
• I have added tests to cover my changes
• All new and existing tests passed
• I have added a changelog entry. Adding a new entry must be accomplished by running the scripts/new-change script and following the instructions. Commit the new file created by the script in .changes/next-release with your changes.
• My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

• I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

[L-Applin]

Can we add some tests cases for this new validation?

[L-Applin]

I think we need a test with an actual multipart s3AsyncClient, ie:

S3AsyncClient client = S3AsyncClient client = S3AsyncClient
    .builder()
    .multipartEnabled(true)
    // other configs
    .build();

We can still mock the http client but that might be a hard test to mock, let me think about it to see if there is a way to do it.

[sonarqubecloud]

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud

[zoewangg]

Just curious, why are we making this change?