Skip to content

Conversation

cbfyi
Copy link
Contributor

@cbfyi cbfyi commented Apr 15, 2025

It is a nice primitive, but we might not benefit much from it.

Realistically, we will not be cloning the Database often, and even when we do, the costs of doing it is low relative to the performance gains from TrieDB overall.

It is a nice primitive, but we might not benefit much from it.

Realistically, we will not be cloning the `Database` often,
and even when we do, the costs of doing it is low relative
to the performance gains from TrieDB overall.
@cb-heimdall
Copy link
Collaborator

cb-heimdall commented Apr 15, 2025

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 0
Sum 1

@jjtny1 jjtny1 changed the title [Do Not Merge] Experiment w/ removing lifetimes from Transaction TrieDB Reth Integration Changes Jun 4, 2025
@jjtny1 jjtny1 marked this pull request as ready for review June 4, 2025 19:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants