bugfix/KBDEV-1404-updating-variant-record-dose-not-trigger-displayName-update

[sshugsc]

KBDEV-1404:

• exclude displayName when patch the variant (displayName will be generated by API if it is not provided)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 56.69%. Comparing base (cbe521d) to head (1b2378a).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/components/VariantForm/index.tsx	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #104      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    56.70%   56.69%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          102      102              
  Lines         3890     3891       +1     
  Branches      1316     1316              
===========================================
  Hits          2206     2206              
- Misses        1672     1673       +1     
  Partials        12       12              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[mathieulemieux]

Tested on both CategoryVariant and PositionalVariant and displayName get regenerated as expected.
Existing tests are passing.

@elewis2, 2 comments:

• Refreshing the page is needed in order to see the changes. Discussed at last Sprint meeting; don't know if supposed to happen in this PR, in another one, or it's a won't do.
• Had to use Node v20 to align with current lockFileVersion 3 when installing dependencies, but GH checks still using v16. Discussed ~2y ago here: Chore/kbdev 1206 update pori imports #78 (review)