Skip to content

Fix scaling-dependence of termination criterion#47

Open
mjacobse wants to merge 1 commit into
bellockk:masterfrom
mjacobse:fix_termination_criterion
Open

Fix scaling-dependence of termination criterion#47
mjacobse wants to merge 1 commit into
bellockk:masterfrom
mjacobse:fix_termination_criterion

Conversation

@mjacobse
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mjacobse mjacobse commented Dec 6, 2023

The termination criterion for bisecting alpha implicitly assumes the optimal alpha to be in the order of magnitude of 1.0. For larger values of alpha, lower and upper can never get close enough, meaning the bisection never terminates successfully. This happens already with an example like this:

alpha = optimizealpha(
            [(0., 0.), (0., 0.1), (0.1, 0.1), (0.1, 0.),
             (0.05, 0.025), (0.05, 0.075), (0.025, 0.05), (0.075, 0.05)])

For smaller values of alpha, the bisection may terminate much too early, returning a very suboptimal alpha.

This fixes that by checking the relative instead of the absolute difference using numpy.isclose. Also, this adds tests with a large and a tiny optimal alpha that would have failed with the previous termination criterion.

An alternative might be to check np.nextafter(lower, upper) == upper, to ensure finding the exact threshold.

See also #18 . A user-defined tolerance as suggested there might be a good future addition. But for now, this change would at least make the function usable for larger alphas.

@bellockk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Once conflicts are resolved I will re-review.

The termination criterion for bisecting alpha implicitly assumes the
optimal alpha to be in the order of magnitude of 1.0. For larger values
of alpha, lower and upper can never get close enough, meaning the
bisection never terminates successfully. For smaller values of alpha,
the bisection may terminate much too early.

This fixes that by checking the relative instead of the absolute
difference using numpy.isclose. Also, this adds tests with a large and
a tiny optimal alpha that would have failed with the previous
termination criterion (they also wouldve failed for much more moderate
scaling factors like 100).
@mjacobse mjacobse force-pushed the fix_termination_criterion branch from d8256ad to 33bf675 Compare September 27, 2024 16:36
@mjacobse
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mjacobse commented Oct 8, 2024

Once conflicts are resolved I will re-review.

conflicts resolved

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants