Skip to content

Conversation

espindola
Copy link
Contributor

This makes the future implementation private. This is a braking change, but:

  • It is unlikely anyone was using GetConn directly instead of just awaiting it.

  • This opens the way for replacing the manual implementation with an async fn.

@espindola
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ping. I have a patch that makes get_conn a plain async fn, but it depends on this.

@espindola
Copy link
Contributor Author

ping. I have rebased it on top of current master.

@espindola
Copy link
Contributor Author

In case you find it easier to review it all at once, #285 has both this patch and the conversion to a plain async fn.

@espindola
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have rebased it once more.

This makes the future implementation private. This is a braking
change, but:

* It is unlikely anyone was using GetConn directly instead of just
  awaiting it.

* This opens the way for replacing the manual implementation with an
  async fn.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant