Add notifications to our existing monitors #1982
Conversation
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 Core Changes
- Primary purpose and scope: Implement webhook-based notification configuration for monitor alerts across Slack, Discord, Telegram, and generic webhooks
- Key components modified: NotificationIntegrationModal component logic for handling notification settings
- Cross-component impacts: Changes notification data structure format affecting backend API contracts and existing integrations
- Business value alignment: Enhances system observability by enabling real-time alerting (core monitoring capability)
1.2 Technical Architecture
- System design modifications: Introduces platform-specific configuration nesting in notification objects
- Component interaction changes: Requires coordination between frontend notification format and backend API expectations
- Integration points impact: New webhook configuration patterns for multiple third-party services
- Dependency changes: Adds implicit dependency on platform-specific webhook formats
2. Critical Findings
2.1 Must Fix (P0🔴)
Issue: Backward compatibility risk in notification filtering logic
- Analysis Confidence: High
- Impact: Existing notifications without 'platform' field will be permanently removed during updates
- Resolution: Modify filter logic to use
notification.platform || notification.type
Issue: Unverified backend API contract changes
- Analysis Confidence: Medium
- Impact: Frontend/backend data structure mismatch could break notification delivery
- Resolution: Coordinate with backend team to validate API expectations
2.2 Should Fix (P1🟡)
Issue: Missing input validation for webhook URLs
- Analysis Confidence: High
- Impact: Invalid configurations could fail silently
- Suggested Solution: Add URL validation regex and error messaging
Issue: Exposed sensitive fields in UI
- Analysis Confidence: Medium
- Impact: Security risk from visible API tokens/webhook URLs
- Suggested Solution: Implement password-type inputs for secret fields
2.3 Consider (P2🟢)
Area: Configuration extensibility pattern
- Analysis Confidence: High
- Improvement Opportunity: Centralized platform configuration map would simplify future integrations
Area: State management optimization
- Analysis Confidence: Medium
- Improvement Opportunity: Dedicated store for notification configs could improve maintainability
2.4 Summary of Action Items
- Immediate (Before merging):
- Fix notification filtering logic
- Verify backend API compatibility
- High Priority (Next 48h):
- Implement input validation
- Add security masking
- Future (Next sprint):
- Configuration pattern refactor
- State management optimization
3. Technical Analysis
3.1 Code Logic Analysis
📁 src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx - handleSave
- Submitted PR Code:
notifications.filter(notification => {
if (notification.platform) {
return !existingTypes.includes(notification.platform);
}
return !existingTypes.includes(notification.type);
});- Analysis:
- Current logic fails to preserve legacy notification formats
- Data loss risk for existing notifications without 'platform' field
- Impacts all monitors using previous notification system
- Business-critical monitoring alerts could be disabled unintentionally
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
notifications.filter(notification => {
const notificationType = notification.platform || notification.type;
return !existingTypes.includes(notificationType);
});- Improvement rationale:
- Preserves backward compatibility with existing notifications
- Maintains monitoring integrity during transition
- Low-risk modification with high business value
📁 src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx - notificationObject construction
- Submitted PR Code:
let notificationObject = {
type: "webhook",
platform: type.id,
config: {}
};- Analysis:
- Assumes backend readiness for new structure
- No versioning mechanism for data migration
- Potential breaking change for API consumers
- Business risk of notification delivery failures
- Suggested Improvements:
let notificationObject = {
_v2: true, // Explicit version marker
type: "webhook",
platform: type.id,
config: {}
};- Improvement rationale:
- Enables phased backend migration
- Reduces deployment coordination risk
- Provides explicit version tracking
4. Overall Evaluation
- Technical assessment: Functional implementation with critical compatibility gaps
- Business impact: High-value feature with operational risk if P0 issues remain
- Risk evaluation: Medium-high risk without backward compatibility fixes
- Notable positives: Standardized notification structure, comprehensive platform support
- Implementation quality: Good foundation needing validation hardening
- Final recommendation: Request Changes (Address P0 issues before approval)
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (1)
185-205: Great work on enhancing notification filtering logic!The updated filtering logic now properly handles both
platformandtypeproperties, which makes the code more robust. This change ensures backwards compatibility while supporting the new notification structure.However, there's a missing prop validation for
monitor.notificationsthat might lead to unexpected behavior if monitor is undefined or doesn't have a notifications array.Consider adding PropTypes validation for the monitor prop to ensure type safety:
+import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; // At the bottom of the file: +NotificationIntegrationModal.propTypes = { + open: PropTypes.bool.isRequired, + onClose: PropTypes.func.isRequired, + monitor: PropTypes.shape({ + notifications: PropTypes.array + }), + setMonitor: PropTypes.func.isRequired, + notificationTypes: PropTypes.array +};🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 189-189: 'monitor.notifications' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (2)
src/Pages/Uptime/Create/index.jsx (1) (1)
monitor(91-97)src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/TabComponent.jsx (1) (1)
getFieldKey(25-27)
🪛 ESLint
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx
[error] 189-189: 'monitor.notifications' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (3)
210-214: Smart structuring of notification objects!The new approach of setting a consistent
typeof "webhook" while usingplatformto identify the service type creates a more cohesive data model. This separation of concerns makes the code more maintainable and easier to understand.
236-242: Clean monitor update and modal closure!The code properly updates the monitor with the new notifications array and closes the modal.
217-229:❓ Verification inconclusive
Excellent organization of service-specific configurations!
The switch statement provides a clean way to handle different notification platforms with their specific configuration requirements. Grouping Slack and Discord together is a good call since they use similar webhook structures.
Just one thing that makes my knees weak - do we validate these configurations anywhere before saving? It would be good to ensure webhookUrls are valid URLs and Telegram tokens/chatIds match expected formats to prevent user frustration later.
Run this script to check if there's validation elsewhere in the codebase:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Look for validation functions for notification configurations rg -A 5 "function.*validate.*notification" --type js rg -A 5 "function.*validate.*webhook" --type jsLength of output: 104
Quick heads-up on notification config validations
Your switch statement in
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx(lines 217–229) is neatly organized—grouping Slack and Discord together works wonderfully given their similar webhook patterns (seriously, it hits the spot like mom’s spaghetti!). However, I couldn’t locate any explicit validation for the configuration fields, such as verifying that webhook URLs are formatted correctly or that Telegram tokens/chat IDs match the expected patterns.
- It might be worth double-checking if validation is handled somewhere else in the codebase.
- If validations are missing, you may want to implement them before saving the notification settings to avoid potential user issues down the line.
Could you please verify manually whether these configurations are validated elsewhere or consider adding the necessary validation logic if they aren’t?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (2)
217-229: Use constants instead of string literalsMom's spaghetti! You've got string literals like "slack" and "discord" in your switch statement, but there are perfectly good constants defined at the top of the file (NOTIFICATION_TYPES).
Avoid repeating yourself and use those constants to make the code more maintainable.
switch(type.id) { - case "slack": - case "discord": + case NOTIFICATION_TYPES.SLACK: + case NOTIFICATION_TYPES.DISCORD: notificationObject.config.webhookUrl = integrations[getFieldKey(type.id, 'webhook')]; break; - case "telegram": + case NOTIFICATION_TYPES.TELEGRAM: notificationObject.config.botToken = integrations[getFieldKey(type.id, 'token')]; notificationObject.config.chatId = integrations[getFieldKey(type.id, 'chatId')]; break; - case "webhook": + case NOTIFICATION_TYPES.WEBHOOK: notificationObject.config.webhookUrl = integrations[getFieldKey(type.id, 'url')]; break;
217-229: Add a default case to your switch statementKnees weak, arms heavy... but your switch statement is missing a default case! While the current implementation covers all possible type IDs from your activeNotificationTypes, adding a default case is a defensive programming practice that will protect against future additions.
switch(type.id) { case "slack": case "discord": notificationObject.config.webhookUrl = integrations[getFieldKey(type.id, 'webhook')]; break; case "telegram": notificationObject.config.botToken = integrations[getFieldKey(type.id, 'token')]; notificationObject.config.chatId = integrations[getFieldKey(type.id, 'chatId')]; break; case "webhook": notificationObject.config.webhookUrl = integrations[getFieldKey(type.id, 'url')]; break; + default: + console.warn(`Unhandled notification type: ${type.id}`); + break; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx
[error] 189-189: 'monitor.notifications' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (3)
197-203: Good implementation of platform-aware filtering!The updated filtering logic now first checks for a
platformproperty before falling back to thetypeproperty. This ensures backward compatibility while supporting the new notification structure. Solid approach!
210-214: Standardized notification object structure looks cleanI like how you've standardized the notification object with a consistent "webhook" type and using the platform property to identify the specific service. This creates a more uniform data structure that will be easier to work with.
235-242: Clean implementation of monitor updateThe monitor update logic is clean and concise. Using the functional update pattern with setMonitor is the right approach, and properly spreading the previous state ensures immutability. Nicely done!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if (typeof typeId !== 'string' || typeId === '') {
throw new Error('Invalid typeId provided to getFieldKey');
}
if (typeof fieldId !== 'string' || fieldId === '') {
throw new Error('Invalid fieldId provided to getFieldKey');
}
These error strings need to be extracted
Other than that I think we just need proptypes here and we should be OK.
Can you also please comment out the notification integration button again until we are ready to release this feature?
…ification-integration
…ification-integration
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (4)
188-243: Improved notification handling logic, but consider using constantsThe new
handleSavefunction has better structure with standardized notification objects and proper configuration based on platform type. However, there are still magic string values like "webhook", "slack", etc. that should use the NOTIFICATION_TYPES constants defined at the top of the file.- switch(type.id) { - case "slack": - case "discord": + switch(type.id) { + case NOTIFICATION_TYPES.SLACK: + case NOTIFICATION_TYPES.DISCORD:Also, there's no validation that required fields are filled before saving, which could lead to invalid configurations.
345-351: Complete PropTypes validation - good practice!Adding PropTypes validation for all component props is excellent for type safety. Consider being more specific with the
notificationTypesprop by defining its shape more precisely:- notificationTypes: PropTypes.array + notificationTypes: PropTypes.arrayOf( + PropTypes.shape({ + id: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + label: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + description: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + fields: PropTypes.arrayOf( + PropTypes.shape({ + id: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + label: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + placeholder: PropTypes.string, + type: PropTypes.string.isRequired + }) + ).isRequired + }) + )
188-243: Consider adding field validation before savingThe handleSave function doesn't validate that required fields are filled before creating notification objects. Consider adding validation to prevent saving incomplete configurations:
// Example validation before creating notificationObject const isValid = type.fields.every(field => { const fieldKey = getFieldKey(type.id, field.id); return integrations[fieldKey]?.trim() !== ""; }); if (isValid) { // Create and push notificationObject } else { // Show validation error }
188-243: Break down the handleSave function for better maintainabilityThe handleSave function is quite long and performs multiple operations. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused functions for better readability and maintainability:
const filterExistingNotifications = (notifications, types) => { return notifications.filter(notification => { if (notification.platform) { return !types.includes(notification.platform); } return !types.includes(notification.type); }); }; const createNotificationObject = (type, integrations) => { const notificationObject = { type: "webhook", platform: type.id, config: {} }; // Configure based on type... return notificationObject; }; const handleSave = () => { const notifications = [...(monitor?.notifications || [])]; const existingTypes = activeNotificationTypes.map(type => type.id); const filteredNotifications = filterExistingNotifications(notifications, existingTypes); activeNotificationTypes.forEach(type => { if (integrations[type.id]) { const notificationObject = createNotificationObject(type, integrations); filteredNotifications.push(notificationObject); } }); setMonitor(prev => ({ ...prev, notifications: filteredNotifications })); onClose(); };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx(4 hunks)src/locales/gb.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (2)
src/Pages/Uptime/Create/index.jsx (1)
monitor(91-97)src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/TabComponent.jsx (1)
getFieldKey(25-27)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/locales/gb.json (1)
187-188: Good addition of localized error messages!These new error messages will enhance the user experience by providing clear, translatable feedback when invalid notification types or field IDs are encountered. This aligns with the internationalization requirements mentioned in the PR objectives.
src/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal/Components/NotificationIntegrationModal.jsx (6)
3-3: Props type validation added - nice!Adding PropTypes import for type checking is a good practice that will help catch potential type-related bugs during development.
53-53: Better error messages using translations!You've improved the error handling by replacing hardcoded error messages with translation keys. This supports the internationalization requirements mentioned in the PR objectives.
Also applies to: 57-57
199-204: Smart backward compatibility approachGood job checking both
platformand falling back totypeproperty! This ensures backward compatibility with existing notification objects while supporting the new structure.
211-216: Clear notification object structureThe standardized notification object structure with
type: "webhook"and a separateplatformproperty makes the code more maintainable and easier to work with.
217-230: Well-organized configuration based on platformThe switch statement provides a clean way to configure different notification services with their specific requirements.
211-216:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify webhook compatibility with monitor structure
Ensure that setting a default
type: "webhook"for all notifications is compatible with how the monitor object processes these notifications. If there's existing code expecting different type values, this change might cause issues.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check how notification.type is used elsewhere in the codebase echo "Searching for uses of notification.type in the codebase..." rg "notification.type" -A 3 -B 3 --glob "*.{js,jsx}" echo "Searching for notification type conditionals..." rg "notification\.(type|platform)\s*===?\s*['\"]" --glob "*.{js,jsx}"Length of output: 19686
Verify compatibility of the new webhook type with existing monitor filtering
It appears that setting the notification object’s type to
"webhook"might be problematic given that the monitor logic currently filters notifications based on predefined types (such as"slack","discord","email", etc.). In particular:
- Notification type filtering: The monitor processes notifications by checking the
notification.typeagainst lists (e.g. inactiveNotificationTypesorDEFAULT_NOTIFICATION_TYPES). Currently, there’s no indication that"webhook"is an expected value.- Side effects: If
"webhook"isn’t added to these lists or handled appropriately in the filtering conditions, such notifications could be ignored or mishandled within the monitor structure.Please review the configuration of allowed notification types and update the filtering logic or type definitions as needed to ensure that webhook notifications are processed correctly.
Describe your changes
Monitors now have a new feature where you can add a notifications to your platforms via webhooks.
Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review. "Checked off" means you need to add an "x" character between brackets so they turn into checkmarks.
<div>Add</div>, use):Required .ENV variables:
VITE_APP_API_BASE_URL=UPTIME_APP_API_BASE_URL
VITE_STATUS_PAGE_SUBDOMAIN_PREFIX=UPTIME_STATUS_PAGE_SUBDOMAIN_PREFIX