Skip to content

propose(contract): evidence-based deletion — 9.2KB -> 4.1KB, every cut carries its receipt - #1045

Draft
boshu2 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
estate-deletion-proposal
Draft

propose(contract): evidence-based deletion — 9.2KB -> 4.1KB, every cut carries its receipt#1045
boshu2 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
estate-deletion-proposal

Conversation

@boshu2

@boshu2 boshu2 commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

DRAFT — merges only on Bo's ratify. Per evals/estate-ablation/PROPOSAL.md:
Authority-and-trust kept as the measured SURVIVOR (Claude executors applied
it mid-run, sweep 4); runtime/constraint floors shrunk to pointers (hook and
gate carry them); triggered-sources table deleted (reference never observed
load-bearing in 80+ transcripts); core loop / boundary / closeout compressed
as orchestrator-facing product spec; concurrency shrunk (native competence
measured, rt-01). Zero binding rules weakened. The measured 80%-equivalent
waste is codex-side always-on skill injection — separate mechanism PR.

…t carries its receipt

DRAFT — merges only on Bo's ratify. Per evals/estate-ablation/PROPOSAL.md:
Authority-and-trust kept as the measured SURVIVOR (Claude executors applied
it mid-run, sweep 4); runtime/constraint floors shrunk to pointers (hook and
gate carry them); triggered-sources table deleted (reference never observed
load-bearing in 80+ transcripts); core loop / boundary / closeout compressed
as orchestrator-facing product spec; concurrency shrunk (native competence
measured, rt-01). Zero binding rules weakened. The measured 80%-equivalent
waste is codex-side always-on skill injection — separate mechanism PR.
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the docs label Aug 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant