Add validation to check document ids before api calling #169
Conversation
cp-sneh-s
changed the title
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@cp-sneh-s has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request involves modifications to several service classes in the data layer, focusing on simplifying the handling of document references and identifiers in Firestore. The changes primarily remove null-checks and conditional logic when referencing documents, directly using provided identifiers like Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt (1)
Line range hint
6-6: Remove unused import.The import
ApiUserServiceis no longer used after the constructor changes and should be removed to address the pipeline failure.-import com.canopas.yourspace.data.service.user.ApiUserService
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt (1)
Line range hint
33-143: Consider implementing a validation layer.Given the critical nature of messaging functionality and the PR's focus on preventing invalid document references, consider implementing a dedicated validation layer that:
- Validates all document IDs (threadId, spaceId, userId) before Firestore operations
- Provides consistent error handling across all methods
- Prevents potential Firestore errors due to invalid references
This would align with the PR's objective of enhancing input validation while maintaining the simplified service structure.
Would you like me to propose a design for this validation layer?
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/place/ApiPlaceService.kt (1)
Line range hint
16-19: Consider architectural improvements for better reliability.
- Add transaction boundaries for multi-document operations (e.g.,
addPlace,joinUserToExistingPlaces).- Consider separating Places API operations into a dedicated service.
- Implement consistent error handling across all operations.
Example transaction implementation for
addPlace:suspend fun addPlace( spaceId: String, createdBy: String, name: String, latitude: Double, longitude: Double, spaceMemberIds: List<String> ) { + db.runTransaction { transaction -> val placeDoc = spacePlacesRef(spaceId).document() val place = ApiPlace( id = placeDoc.id, created_by = createdBy, space_id = spaceId, name = name, latitude = latitude, longitude = longitude ) - placeDoc.set(place).await() + transaction.set(placeDoc, place) val settings = spaceMemberIds.map { memberId -> val filterIds = spaceMemberIds.filter { it != memberId } ApiPlaceMemberSetting( place_id = place.id, user_id = memberId, arrival_alert_for = filterIds, leave_alert_for = filterIds ) } settings.forEach { setting -> - spacePlacesSettingsRef(spaceId, place.id).document(setting.user_id).set(setting).await() + val settingDoc = spacePlacesSettingsRef(spaceId, place.id).document(setting.user_id) + transaction.set(settingDoc, setting) } + }.await() }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt(1 hunks)data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/place/ApiPlaceService.kt(1 hunks)data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/space/ApiSpaceService.kt(1 hunks)data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/user/ApiUserService.kt(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Android Build
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt
[error] 6-6: Unused import
🔇 Additional comments (7)
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt (2)
25-25: Verify the removal of userService dependency.The removal of
userServicefrom the constructor simplifies the service, but please verify that:
- No user validation was previously performed using this service
- The validation has been moved elsewhere or is no longer required
✅ Verification successful
The removal of userService dependency is safe
The ApiMessagesService is correctly focused on message operations, with no evidence of previous user validation logic. The service appropriately accepts validated user IDs as parameters, maintaining clean separation of concerns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any previous usages of userService in git history git log -p -- data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt | grep -B 5 -A 5 "userService" # Search for any new validation logic in other services rg "ApiUserService.*validate" --type kotlinLength of output: 45
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get current implementation of ApiMessagesService cat data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt # Search for validation patterns in messages rg "validate|check|verify" --type kotlin -g "*Message*.kt" -A 3 -B 3 # Search for user validation patterns rg "validateUser|checkUser|verifyUser" --type kotlin -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 8115
30-31: Verify threadId validation in upstream calls.The direct use of
threadIdwithout validation could lead to runtime errors if invalid IDs are passed. Since the PR aims to enhance input validation, please ensure that:
- All callers validate
threadIdbefore invoking this method- There's proper error handling for invalid thread IDs in the upstream code
✅ Verification successful
Input validation for threadId is properly implemented
The direct use of
threadIdinthreadMessagesRefis safe because:
- Input validation is correctly implemented in MessagesViewModel (checks for
isEmpty())- The Kotlin type system ensures
threadIdis non-null through the entire call chain- The architecture follows proper layering with validation at the UI entry points
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all callers of threadMessagesRef ast-grep --pattern 'threadMessagesRef($id)' -l kotlin # Search for threadId validation patterns rg 'threadId.*isNullOrBlank|threadId.*isEmpty|validate.*threadId' --type kotlinLength of output: 657
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all references to ApiMessagesService rg "ApiMessagesService" -l # Find all method calls to threadMessagesRef ast-grep --pattern "threadMessagesRef" -l kotlin # Get implementation context of threadMessagesRef calls rg "threadMessagesRef" -B 5 -A 5 --type kotlinLength of output: 11446
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/place/ApiPlaceService.kt (1)
28-29:⚠️ Potential issueAdd comprehensive validation for document path parameters.
The function creates nested document references without validating
spaceIdorplaceId. Since this handles member settings, invalid references could lead to data integrity and security issues.Consider adding validation and parent document verification:
private fun spacePlacesSettingsRef(spaceId: String, placeId: String) = + require(spaceId.isNotBlank() && placeId.isNotBlank()) { + "spaceId and placeId cannot be blank" + } spaceRef.document(spaceId).collection(Config.FIRESTORE_COLLECTION_SPACE_PLACES) .document(placeId).collection(Config.FIRESTORE_COLLECTION_SPACE_PLACES_MEMBER_SETTINGS)Additionally, consider verifying parent documents exist before operations:
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/user/ApiUserService.kt (1)
48-53: Verify security implications of simplified document references.The changes simplify document reference handling in security-sensitive operations. While the core security mechanisms remain unchanged, please ensure:
- Test cases cover error scenarios with invalid user IDs
- Authentication flows validate user IDs before any Firestore operations
- Session management correctly handles invalid references
Let's verify the test coverage:
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/space/ApiSpaceService.kt (3)
51-62: Add test coverage for new error handling scenarios.The changes introduce new error paths and null handling that should be tested:
- Space creation with null user
- Space creation failure scenarios
- Error propagation in service boundaries
Would you like me to help create test cases for these scenarios? I can provide a comprehensive test suite that covers:
- Success cases
- Authentication failures
- Database operation failures
- Error propagation
42-62: Verify authentication and authorization checks across service boundaries.The removal of null checks could potentially expose security vulnerabilities. Ensure that:
- All public methods validate authentication state
- Authorization checks are performed before space operations
- Input validation is consistent across service boundaries
Run this script to verify authentication checks:
42-42: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd input validation for spaceId parameter.
Direct usage of spaceId without validation could lead to invalid Firestore document references. Consider adding validation to ensure spaceId is not blank or malformed.
private fun spaceMemberRef(spaceId: String) = + require(spaceId.isNotBlank()) { "spaceId cannot be blank" } spaceRef.document(spaceId).collection(FIRESTORE_COLLECTION_SPACE_MEMBERS) private fun spaceGroupKeysDoc(spaceId: String) = + require(spaceId.isNotBlank()) { "spaceId cannot be blank" } spaceRef.document(spaceId).collection(FIRESTORE_COLLECTION_SPACE_GROUP_KEYS) .document(FIRESTORE_COLLECTION_SPACE_GROUP_KEYS)Also applies to: 45-45
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/place/ApiPlaceService.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/user/ApiUserService.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/user/ApiUserService.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/space/ApiSpaceService.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt (1)
Line range hint
32-127: Enhance input validation across service methods.Several methods accept IDs and data without proper validation, which could lead to data corruption or runtime errors. This needs to be addressed to align with the PR's goal of improving input validation.
Consider adding these validations:
suspend fun createThread(spaceId: String, adminId: String): String { + require(spaceId.isNotBlank()) { "SpaceId cannot be blank" } + require(adminId.isNotBlank()) { "AdminId cannot be blank" } val docRef = threadRef.document() // ... rest of the method } suspend fun joinThread(threadId: String, userIds: List<String>) { + require(threadId.isNotBlank()) { "ThreadId cannot be blank" } + require(userIds.isNotEmpty()) { "UserIds list cannot be empty" } + require(userIds.all { it.isNotBlank() }) { "UserIds cannot contain blank values" } threadRef.document(threadId) // ... rest of the method } suspend fun sendMessage(threadId: String, senderId: String, message: String) { + require(threadId.isNotBlank()) { "ThreadId cannot be blank" } + require(senderId.isNotBlank()) { "SenderId cannot be blank" } + require(message.isNotBlank()) { "Message cannot be blank" } val docRef = threadMessagesRef(threadId).document() // ... rest of the method }Consider creating a utility object for common validations:
object ValidationUtils { fun validateThreadId(threadId: String) { require(threadId.isNotBlank()) { "ThreadId cannot be blank" } } fun validateUserId(userId: String) { require(userId.isNotBlank()) { "UserId cannot be blank" } } fun validateSpaceId(spaceId: String) { require(spaceId.isNotBlank()) { "SpaceId cannot be blank" } } }
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt (1)
Line range hint
1-127: Consider implementing a comprehensive validation strategy.While the PR aims to improve validation, the current changes in this service appear to reduce validation checks. Given that this is a critical messaging service interacting directly with Firestore, we should consider implementing a comprehensive validation strategy:
- Input Validation Layer: Create a validation layer that all incoming parameters must pass through before reaching the service methods.
- Error Handling: Implement specific exception types for different validation failures.
- Logging: Add logging for validation failures to help with debugging.
- Documentation: Document validation requirements for each method.
Would you like me to provide a detailed implementation plan for this validation strategy?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt (1)
24-24: Verify the safety of removing userService dependency.The removal of
userServicefrom the constructor aligns with simplifying the service, but we should verify that no user validation was required in this service.Let's check for any previous usage of userService in this class:
✅ Verification successful
Removal of userService dependency is correct and safe
The ApiMessagesService class is properly focused on Firebase operations without user validation responsibilities. User-related validations are correctly handled in the repository layer, as evidenced by the userService usage in SpaceRepository and MessagesRepository.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any previous usage of userService in the class # and any potential validation that might have been removed git log -p data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt | grep -B 5 -A 5 "userService"Length of output: 0
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining references to userService and user validation patterns ast-grep --pattern 'userService' # Get the current implementation of the service class cat data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt # Look for validation-related patterns ast-grep --pattern 'validate' ast-grep --pattern 'check'Length of output: 7967
data/src/main/java/com/canopas/yourspace/data/service/messages/ApiMessagesService.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Bug Fixes
Improved error handling and input validation across multiple services.
Enhanced null safety checks in authentication and user management.
Prevented potential invalid document references in location and journey services.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Bug Fixes