Skip to content

perf: changed java-http-client version to latest version with new Tup…#65

Draft
sbckr wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
optimize-tuple-management
Draft

perf: changed java-http-client version to latest version with new Tup…#65
sbckr wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
optimize-tuple-management

Conversation

@sbckr
Copy link
Member

@sbckr sbckr commented Sep 10, 2024

…leList serialization

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.04%. Comparing base (0b1866f) to head (5b9aeaa).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #65   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     90.04%   90.04%           
  Complexity      348      348           
=========================================
  Files            49       49           
  Lines          1326     1326           
  Branches         70       70           
=========================================
  Hits           1194     1194           
  Misses           80       80           
  Partials         52       52           
Flag Coverage Δ
java-client 90.45% <ø> (ø)
service 93.60% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0b1866f...5b9aeaa. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member Author

@sbckr sbckr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, however I'd expect it to use latest versions onze tuple management optimizations have been merged respectively for java-http-client and castor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants