Skip to content

Remove flush_async workaround as it is no longer needed in newer ACPP versions #333

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 18, 2025

Conversation

GagaLP
Copy link
Contributor

@GagaLP GagaLP commented Aug 14, 2025

Removes the flush_async workaround for newer ACPP versions, as the asynchronous submission worker thread was removed in Acpp PR #1798.
Maintains compatibility with older ACPP versions.

@GagaLP GagaLP requested a review from PeterTh August 14, 2025 13:11
Copy link

Check-perf-impact results: (ae6918621b46271c2f10d6eb978fe95d)

❓ No new benchmark data submitted. ❓
Please re-run the microbenchmarks and include the results if your commit could potentially affect performance.

Copy link
Contributor

@PeterTh PeterTh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@PeterTh
Copy link
Contributor

PeterTh commented Aug 14, 2025

The coverage reporting run is currently failing not because of anything on our side, but because coveralls.io seems to have problems.

Since this PR doesn't substantially change anything about coverage we could still merge it, but that would mean that the main build would be red, so let's wait a bit to see if this clears up.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 16966111156

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 95.067%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 16268669920: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 7156
Relevant Lines: 7261

💛 - Coveralls

@PeterTh PeterTh merged commit 4acfa39 into master Aug 18, 2025
43 of 45 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants