Work-in-Progress: Design the API so that approaches can incorporate custom dataset forks and temporal information #1
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
This is a WIP Pull Request where I aim to discuss how the API can allow to use temporal information without having to hard-code them.
My intention is, that it would be cool if the ir-datasets-longeval extension directly allows to run on "non official" dataset forks that users might modify to support their experiments (e.g., as we did this in the ECIR paper).
There is currently no implementation, I was thinking it would be good to first start to sketch how it would look like from the "developer perspective", i.e., I only modified the README.
With this, approaches submit to LongEval could look like this:
Run something on an official dataset:
Run something on a local modification of the dataset:
What do you think?
Best regards,
Maik