Skip to content

Comments

Use storage-cli in ops file for gcs blobstore#1316

Open
kathap wants to merge 1 commit intocloudfoundry:developfrom
sap-contributions:use_storage_cli_on_gcs
Open

Use storage-cli in ops file for gcs blobstore#1316
kathap wants to merge 1 commit intocloudfoundry:developfrom
sap-contributions:use_storage_cli_on_gcs

Conversation

@kathap
Copy link

@kathap kathap commented Feb 19, 2026

Add bucket name and remove now obsolete project and account email.

WHAT is this change about?

Change the use-gcs-blobstore-service-account.yml ops file and vars-use-gcs-blobstore-service-account.yml vars file to use the "storage-cli" implementation instead of the deprecated "fog" library.

What customer problem is being addressed? Use customer persona to define the problem e.g. Alana is unable to...

Alana wants to use the new cloud controller "storage-cli" implementation for blobstore access instead of the deprecated "fog" implementation.

Please provide any contextual information.

RFC-0043 Cloud Controller Blobstore Type: storage-cli

Has a cf-deployment including this change passed cf-acceptance-tests?

  • YES
  • NO

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? Please take a moment to read through the examples before answering the question.

  • YES - please choose the category from below. Feel free to provide additional details.
  • NO

How should this change be described in cf-deployment release notes?

The use-gcs-blobstore-service-account.yml ops file and vars-use-gcs-blobstore-service-account.yml vars file now uses the new "storage-cli" implementation instead of the deprecated "fog" implementation.

Does this PR introduce a new BOSH release into the base cf-deployment.yml manifest or any ops-files?

  • YES - please specify
  • NO

Does this PR make a change to an experimental or GA'd feature/component?

  • experimental feature/component
  • GA'd feature/component

Please provide Acceptance Criteria for this change?

In capi-ci elsa is running on gcs, already since some time with storage-cli.

What is the level of urgency for publishing this change?

  • Urgent - unblocks current or future work
  • Slightly Less than Urgent

Add bucket name and remove now obsolete project and account email.
@kathap kathap marked this pull request as draft February 20, 2026 08:02
@kathap kathap marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2026 09:22
@kathap kathap marked this pull request as draft February 20, 2026 09:29
@kathap kathap marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2026 09:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant