Skip to content

Conversation

@bmo-at-a9s
Copy link
Contributor

@bmo-at-a9s bmo-at-a9s commented Feb 26, 2025

We have implemented support for asynchronous binding operations, allowing services with async instance creation to be bound.

Description

Motivation and Context

It fixes both an old issue on this repo as well as a newer issue raised by @damzog on the intermediate cloudfoundry-community repo.

How Has This Been Tested?

This has been tested manually with stratos running locally on the developer machine and our cloudfoundry staging environment.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Docs update
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have followed the guidelines in CONTRIBUTING.md, including the required formatting of the commit message

kristelaK and others added 2 commits February 26, 2025 09:49
* Add 'Last Service Binding' column to grid view and list view

* Rename the components to remove redundant 'Service' in the naming

* replace ServiceInstanceLastOpComponent in the last service binding tests
Disallow service bind only on service wall mode
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Feb 26, 2025

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: kristelaK / name: Kristela (b9d00c3)
  • ✅ login: tmeier-a9s / name: Tim Meier (9798992)

@krutten
Copy link
Contributor

krutten commented Feb 26, 2025

Working on merging #5052 then we can test and merge this. Thanks.

@mafolz
Copy link
Contributor

mafolz commented Apr 10, 2025

shoudl we rebase this with develop or can we help otherwise on this topic?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants