Skip to content

Conversation

@gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Jul 10, 2025

This pull request includes updates to dependencies, Docker configurations, and workflows, as well as changes to release notes and the changelog. The most significant changes focus on upgrading package versions, improving Dockerfile flexibility, and updating workflow references.

Dependency Updates:

  • Directory.Packages.props: Upgraded various package versions, including Codebelt.Extensions.Swashbuckle.AspNetCore to 9.0.5, Cuemon.Core to 9.0.7, and several Microsoft packages for .NET 8 and .NET 9 frameworks. [1] [2]

Docker Configuration Enhancements:

  • .docfx/Dockerfile.docfx: Introduced an ARG for NGINX_VERSION to dynamically specify the NGINX version, and updated the base and final stages to use this argument. [1] [2]

Workflow Updates:

Release Notes and Changelog Updates:

Test Environment Update:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated package dependencies to the latest compatible versions for all supported target frameworks.
    • Improved Docker build configuration to allow specifying the NGINX version at build time.
    • Updated Docker test environment image to the latest tag.
    • Upgraded referenced GitHub Actions workflow versions for improved CI pipeline reliability.
  • Documentation

    • Added release notes for version 4.0.3, highlighting dependency updates and .NET 9/.NET 8 availability.
    • Updated changelog with details for version 4.0.3.

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Jul 10, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Walkthrough

This update introduces a build argument for the nginx version in the Dockerfile, updates several NuGet package versions, revises test environment Docker image tags, and refreshes release notes and the changelog to reflect a new service update. Additionally, GitHub Actions workflow versions are incremented for code quality checks.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summary
.docfx/Dockerfile.docfx Added NGINX_VERSION build argument; FROM statements now use this variable instead of a fixed version.
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml Updated reusable workflow versions for sonarcloud and codeql from v1 to v2.
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper/PackageReleaseNotes.txt
Added release notes for version 4.0.3, highlighting dependency upgrades and .NET 9/.NET 8 support.
CHANGELOG.md Added entry for version 4.0.3, indicating a service update focused on dependencies.
Directory.Packages.props Incremented versions for several NuGet packages for net8 and net9 target frameworks.
testenvironments.json Updated Docker test runner image tag to newer versions for .NET 8 and .NET 9.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Builder as Docker Build
    participant Dockerfile
    participant Nginx Registry

    Builder->>Dockerfile: Pass NGINX_VERSION (default 1.29.0-alpine)
    Dockerfile->>Nginx Registry: Pull nginx:${NGINX_VERSION}
    Nginx Registry-->>Dockerfile: Provide nginx image
    Dockerfile-->>Builder: Build image using specified nginx version
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • V4.0.2/service update #14: Extends the Dockerfile nginx version update by parameterizing the nginx version with a build argument, directly relating to this PR.
  • V3.0.1/package maintenance #7: Also modifies .docfx/Dockerfile.docfx to update the nginx base image version, but uses a hardcoded update instead of a build argument.
  • V4.0.1/package maintenance #13: Updates the Dockerfile for newer nginx and docfx versions and adds multi-platform support; both PRs modify the same Dockerfile but with different focuses.

Poem

A hop, a skip, a version bump,
Docker's nginx now takes a jump!
NuGets fresh and workflows new,
Testers run in images too.
With changelogs penned and notes in tow,
The codebase grows—onward we go!
🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.docfx/Dockerfile.docfx (1)

1-3: Reuse the first nginx stage instead of pulling twice

The final stage pulls nginx:${NGINX_VERSION} again instead of --from=base, duplicating layers and network traffic.

-FROM nginx:${NGINX_VERSION} AS final
+FROM base AS final

This keeps the image smaller and avoids an extra registry fetch.

Also applies to: 13-13

CHANGELOG.md (1)

7-10: Add links for easier navigation

Consider adding an anchor or comparison link, e.g.:

## [4.0.3] - 2025-07-11
[Full diff](https://github.com/codebeltnet/bootstrapper/compare/v4.0.2...v4.0.3)

This matches earlier entries and helps readers jump to the diff.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 34753e5 and 83586fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • .docfx/Dockerfile.docfx (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (2 hunks)
  • .nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
  • .nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
  • .nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
  • .nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Directory.Packages.props (2 hunks)
  • testenvironments.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
  • GitHub Check: call-test (ubuntu-24.04, Release) / 🧪 Test
  • GitHub Check: call-test (windows-2022, Debug) / 🧪 Test
  • GitHub Check: call-test (windows-2022, Release) / 🧪 Test
  • GitHub Check: call-pack (Release) / 📦 Pack
  • GitHub Check: call-pack (Debug) / 📦 Pack
  • GitHub Check: call-test (ubuntu-24.04, Debug) / 🧪 Test
🔇 Additional comments (8)
testenvironments.json (1)

12-12: Confirm the new image tag exists in the registry

The tag gimlichael/ubuntu-testrunner:net8.0.412-9.0.302 looks correct but is brand-new. Please make sure it has been pushed before the pipeline runs; otherwise the test job will fail on docker pull.

.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (2)

69-69: Version bump to jobs-sonarcloud@v2 – double-check compatibility

v2 is fine, but the reusable workflow recently introduced additional required inputs (java-version, language). Verify this repo’s defaults still satisfy them; otherwise the job will stop at the “validate inputs” step.


87-87: jobs-codeql@v2 introduced matrix-aware upload logic

Make sure your CodeQL upload still reaches the dashboard. In older repos the expected sarif location changed between v1 → v2.

Directory.Packages.props (1)

6-9: Sanity-check transitive impacts of the minor version jumps

All bumps are patch-level, so breakage risk is low. Still, run the full test suite on both net8 and net9 to catch ABI/behaviour shifts (e.g., Microsoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi 8.0.17 → 8.0.18 fixed a nullable-annotation issue).

Also applies to: 18-22, 25-26

.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Worker/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)

1-6: Entry looks good – no issues detected.

Version bump and wording are consistent with the surrounding 4.x entries; nothing further to address.

.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Console/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)

1-6: Entry looks good – no issues detected.

Matches the style and structure of existing 4.x notes; no action required.

.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)

1-6: Entry looks good – no issues detected.

The change log entry is consistent with the rest of the document.

.nuget/Codebelt.Bootstrapper.Web/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1)

1-6: Entry looks good – no issues detected.

Formatting and wording align with the other 4.x entries; ready to merge.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.17%. Comparing base (34753e5) to head (83586fa).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #15   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.17%   76.17%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines         256      256           
  Branches       16       16           
=======================================
  Hits          195      195           
  Misses         61       61           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
2 Accepted issues

Measures
2 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit dc9f6f4 into main Jul 11, 2025
25 of 29 checks passed
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the v4.0.3/service-update branch July 11, 2025 00:02
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants