Skip to content

Conversation

@gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Nov 14, 2024

This pull request includes several changes to the .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml file to remove the use of cache keys for restoring dependencies and a small addition to the Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests.csproj file.

Changes to .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml:

  • Removed the restoreCacheKey output from the Prepare Linux and Prepare Windows jobs. [1] [2]
  • Removed the useRestoreCache parameter from the dotnet-restore steps in both Prepare Linux and Prepare Windows jobs. [1] [2]
  • Removed the restoreCacheKey parameter from the build and pack jobs. [1] [2]

Changes to Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests.csproj:

  • Added a project reference to Cuemon.Extensions.Core.csproj.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced unit tests for the YamlFormatter class, focusing on serialization of culture-specific information.
    • Added a configuration input for manual workflow triggers, allowing users to specify build configurations (Debug or Release).
  • Bug Fixes
    • Streamlined CI/CD pipeline by removing unnecessary jobs and cache-related configurations, potentially improving build performance.
  • Chores
    • Added project references to enhance test dependencies for accessing shared functionality.
    • Updated the Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet package to the stable version.
    • Integrated functionalities from Cuemon.Extensions.IO and Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection into the globalization project.
    • Updated language version to the latest stable version for improved compatibility.

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Nov 14, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow for the Cuemon CI/CD pipeline by removing the prepare_linux and prepare_windows jobs, along with their related outputs. The dotnet-restore step is now integrated directly into the build job. A project reference to Cuemon.Extensions.Core.csproj is added in the test project, and a new test file, YamlSerializerTest.cs, is introduced to validate the YamlFormatter class's handling of culture-specific serialization. Additionally, the version of the Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet package is updated to a stable release.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml Removed prepare_linux and prepare_windows jobs. Eliminated restoreCacheKey inputs from dotnet-build and dotnet-pack steps. Added dotnet-restore step in build job. Updated job dependencies accordingly.
test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests.csproj Added project reference to Cuemon.Extensions.Core.csproj.
test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/YamlSerializerTest.cs Introduced YamlSerializerTest class with methods for testing serialization of CultureInfo properties in YAML format.
Directory.Packages.props Updated Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet package version from 9.0.0-rc.1 to 9.0.0.
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml Updated projects input in pack job to a multi-line string. Added configuration input to workflow_dispatch.
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj Added project references to Cuemon.Extensions.IO.csproj and Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection.csproj.
Directory.Build.props Updated LangVersion from preview to latest and set AnalysisLevel to latest in the non-test project.

Possibly related PRs

  • V9.0.0/xunit testoutputhelperaccessor #78: The main PR modifies the GitHub Actions workflow, which is related to the changes in the ServiceCollectionExtensions class in this PR that enhances logging capabilities for unit tests.
  • V9.0.0/move replace-line-endings to xunit #89: This PR also involves the removal of the ReplaceLineEndings method from the StringExtensions class, which is relevant since the main PR modifies the CI/CD pipeline that may involve similar string handling.
  • V9.0.0/housekeeping for extensions globalization #90: The changes in this PR regarding the CultureInfo handling and test coverage enhancements relate to the overall improvements in the testing framework, which aligns with the main PR's focus on CI/CD and build processes.
  • V9.0.0/service pack 1 #91: This PR updates package references and enhances compatibility with .NET 8, which is relevant to the main PR's modifications in the CI/CD pipeline that may affect build configurations.
  • V9.0.0/dotnet rc2 #94: The updates to the Directory.Build.props file in this PR, which includes package version changes, are directly related to the main PR's focus on modifying the CI/CD pipeline and ensuring compatibility with the latest dependencies.
  • V9.0.0/support for async disposable #98: The introduction of the AsyncDisposable class and updates to the Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit package in this PR are relevant as they enhance the testing capabilities, which ties back to the main PR's modifications in the CI/CD workflow.
  • V9.0.0/rtm #102: The updates to the CI/CD workflows and documentation in this PR are directly related to the main PR's changes in the GitHub Actions workflow, indicating a broader effort to enhance the project's build and deployment processes.

🐇 In the meadow, changes bloom,
Cache keys gone, we make room.
Tests for Yaml, culture's delight,
With every line, our code takes flight.
In CI/CD, we find our way,
Hopping forward, day by day! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/YamlSerializerTest.cs (1)

173-229: Improve test consistency and reduce duplication

The test method has inconsistent naming and duplicates formatter configuration logic.

Consider these improvements:

 [Fact]
 public void Serialize_ShouldSerializeNumberFormatInfo()
 {
-    var sut2 = _cultureInfo;
-    var sut3 = YamlFormatter.SerializeObject(sut2.NumberFormat, o =>
-    {
-        o.Settings.ScalarStyle = ScalarStyle.DoubleQuoted;
-        o.Settings.IndentSequences = false;
-        o.Settings.FormatProvider = _cultureInfo;
-        o.Settings.NamingConvention = PascalCaseNamingConvention.Instance;
-    });
-    var sut4 = sut3.ToEncodedString();
+    // Arrange
+    var culture = _cultureInfo;
+    var formatter = ConfigureFormatter(ScalarStyle.DoubleQuoted);
+    
+    // Act
+    var yaml = YamlFormatter.SerializeObject(culture.NumberFormat, formatter)
+        .ToEncodedString();
 
-    TestOutput.WriteLine(sut4);
+    TestOutput.WriteLine(yaml);
 
-    Assert.Equal(@"...", sut4);
+    // Assert
+    Assert.Equal(GetExpectedNumberFormatYaml(), yaml);
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3f71be2 and e7bdfc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (0 hunks)
  • test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
  • test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/YamlSerializerTest.cs (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests.csproj (1)

8-8: LGTM! The project reference addition is appropriate.

The addition of the Core extensions reference aligns with the PR's objective of supporting new YAML serialization tests. The project hierarchy is maintained correctly.

Let's verify the referenced project exists:

✅ Verification successful

Project reference to Cuemon.Extensions.Core is valid and exists

The verification confirms that the referenced project src/Cuemon.Extensions.Core/Cuemon.Extensions.Core.csproj exists in the codebase, making this a valid project reference addition to support the new YAML serialization tests.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the referenced Core project exists
# Expected: The Core project file should exist at the specified path

if [ -f "src/Cuemon.Extensions.Core/Cuemon.Extensions.Core.csproj" ]; then
    echo "✓ Core project exists"
else
    echo "✗ Core project not found"
fi

Length of output: 122

test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/YamlSerializerTest.cs (1)

1-448: Overall test implementation is thorough and well-structured

The test class provides comprehensive coverage of YAML serialization for culture-specific information, including cross-platform considerations and edge cases.

Comment on lines +32 to +171
[Fact]
public void Serialize_ShouldSerializeDateFormatInfo()
{
var sut2 = _cultureInfo;
var sut3 = YamlFormatter.SerializeObject(sut2.DateTimeFormat, o =>
{
o.Settings.NamingConvention = PascalCaseNamingConvention.Instance;
o.Settings.ScalarStyle = ScalarStyle.Plain;
o.Settings.IndentSequences = false;
o.Settings.FormatProvider = _cultureInfo;
o.Settings.Converters.Add(YamlConverterFactory.Create<DateTime>((writer, dt, _) => writer.WriteValue(dt.ToString(_cultureInfo))));
});
var sut4 = sut3.ToEncodedString();

TestOutput.WriteLine(sut4);

var expected = @"AMDesignator: ''
Calendar:
MinSupportedDateTime: 01-01-0001 00:00:00
MaxSupportedDateTime: 31-12-9999 23:59:59
AlgorithmType: SolarCalendar
CalendarType: Localized
Eras:
- 1
TwoDigitYearMax: {0}
DateSeparator: '-'
FirstDayOfWeek: Monday
CalendarWeekRule: FirstFourDayWeek
FullDateTimePattern: d. MMMM yyyy HH:mm:ss
LongDatePattern: d. MMMM yyyy
LongTimePattern: HH:mm:ss
MonthDayPattern: d. MMMM
PMDesignator: ''
RFC1123Pattern: ddd, dd MMM yyyy HH':'mm':'ss 'GMT'
ShortDatePattern: dd-MM-yyyy
ShortTimePattern: HH:mm
SortableDateTimePattern: yyyy'-'MM'-'dd'T'HH':'mm':'ss
TimeSeparator: ':'
UniversalSortableDateTimePattern: yyyy'-'MM'-'dd HH':'mm':'ss'Z'
YearMonthPattern: MMMM yyyy
AbbreviatedDayNames:
- sø
- ma
- ti
- on
- to
- fr
- lø
ShortestDayNames:
- sø
- ma
- ti
- on
- to
- fr
- lø
DayNames:
- søndag
- mandag
- tirsdag
- onsdag
- torsdag
- fredag
- lørdag
AbbreviatedMonthNames:
- jan
- feb
- mar
- apr
- maj
- jun
- jul
- aug
- sep
- okt
- nov
- dec
- ''
MonthNames:
- januar
- februar
- marts
- april
- maj
- juni
- juli
- august
- september
- oktober
- november
- december
- ''
NativeCalendarName: gregoriansk kalender
AbbreviatedMonthGenitiveNames:
- jan
- feb
- mar
- apr
- maj
- jun
- jul
- aug
- sep
- okt
- nov
- dec
- ''
MonthGenitiveNames:
- januar
- februar
- marts
- april
- maj
- juni
- juli
- august
- september
- oktober
- november
- december
- ''
".ReplaceLineEndings();

#if NET8_0_OR_GREATER
expected = string.Format(expected, "2049");
#elif NET48_OR_GREATER
if (RuntimeInformation.IsOSPlatform(OSPlatform.Linux))
{
expected = expected.ReplaceAll("gregoriansk kalender", "dansk (Danmark)", StringComparison.Ordinal);
expected = string.Format(expected, "2029");
}
else
{
expected = expected.ReplaceAll("gregoriansk", "Gregoriansk", StringComparison.Ordinal);
expected = string.Format(expected, "2049");
}
#endif

Assert.Equal(expected, sut4);
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve test maintainability and documentation

The test method contains complex platform-specific logic and lacks documentation about its purpose and expectations.

Consider these improvements:

  1. Extract expected YAML to a separate resource file
  2. Move platform-specific logic to helper methods
  3. Add XML documentation
+/// <summary>
+/// Verifies that DateTimeFormat information for Danish culture is correctly serialized to YAML.
+/// </summary>
 [Fact]
 public void Serialize_ShouldSerializeDateFormatInfo()
 {
+    // Arrange
     var sut2 = _cultureInfo;
     var formatter = ConfigureFormatter();
-    var sut3 = YamlFormatter.SerializeObject(sut2.DateTimeFormat, o =>
-    {
-        o.Settings.NamingConvention = PascalCaseNamingConvention.Instance;
-        o.Settings.ScalarStyle = ScalarStyle.Plain;
-        o.Settings.IndentSequences = false;
-        o.Settings.FormatProvider = _cultureInfo;
-        o.Settings.Converters.Add(YamlConverterFactory.Create<DateTime>((writer, dt, _) => writer.WriteValue(dt.ToString(_cultureInfo))));
-    });
+    var sut3 = YamlFormatter.SerializeObject(sut2.DateTimeFormat, formatter);
     var sut4 = sut3.ToEncodedString();

+    // Act
     TestOutput.WriteLine(sut4);

-    var expected = @"..."  // Move to resource file
+    var expected = GetExpectedDateFormatYaml();
     
+    // Assert
     Assert.Equal(expected, sut4);
 }

+private Action<YamlFormatterOptions> ConfigureFormatter()
+{
+    return o =>
+    {
+        o.Settings.NamingConvention = PascalCaseNamingConvention.Instance;
+        o.Settings.ScalarStyle = ScalarStyle.Plain;
+        o.Settings.IndentSequences = false;
+        o.Settings.FormatProvider = _cultureInfo;
+        o.Settings.Converters.Add(YamlConverterFactory.Create<DateTime>((writer, dt, _) => 
+            writer.WriteValue(dt.ToString(_cultureInfo))));
+    };
+}

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines 20 to 30
public YamlSerializerTest(ITestOutputHelper output) : base(output)
{
try
{
_cultureInfo = new CultureInfo("da-DK").UseNationalLanguageSupport(); // from .NET6+ this is needed for both Windows and Linux; at least from pipeline (worked locally for Windows without Merge ...)
}
catch (Exception e)
{
TestOutput.WriteLine(e.ToString());
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve constructor's error handling and initialization

The current exception handling could lead to null reference exceptions in test methods if culture initialization fails.

Consider this improved implementation:

 public YamlSerializerTest(ITestOutputHelper output) : base(output)
 {
-    try
-    {
-        _cultureInfo = new CultureInfo("da-DK").UseNationalLanguageSupport();
-    }
-    catch (Exception e)
-    {
-        TestOutput.WriteLine(e.ToString());
-    }
+    try
+    {
+        _cultureInfo = new CultureInfo("da-DK").UseNationalLanguageSupport();
+    }
+    catch (Exception e)
+    {
+        TestOutput.WriteLine(e.ToString());
+        throw new InvalidOperationException("Failed to initialize Danish culture for tests.", e);
+    }
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
public YamlSerializerTest(ITestOutputHelper output) : base(output)
{
try
{
_cultureInfo = new CultureInfo("da-DK").UseNationalLanguageSupport(); // from .NET6+ this is needed for both Windows and Linux; at least from pipeline (worked locally for Windows without Merge ...)
}
catch (Exception e)
{
TestOutput.WriteLine(e.ToString());
}
}
public YamlSerializerTest(ITestOutputHelper output) : base(output)
{
try
{
_cultureInfo = new CultureInfo("da-DK").UseNationalLanguageSupport(); // from .NET6+ this is needed for both Windows and Linux; at least from pipeline (worked locally for Windows without Merge ...)
}
catch (Exception e)
{
TestOutput.WriteLine(e.ToString());
throw new InvalidOperationException("Failed to initialize Danish culture for tests.", e);
}
}

Comment on lines +232 to +446
[Fact]
public void Serialize_ShouldSerializeCultureInfo()
{
var sut2 = _cultureInfo;
var sut3 = YamlFormatter.SerializeObject(sut2, o =>
{
o.Settings.IndentSequences = false;
o.Settings.NamingConvention = PascalCaseNamingConvention.Instance;
o.Settings.Converters.Add(YamlConverterFactory.Create<DateTime>((writer, dt, _) => writer.WriteValue(dt.ToString(_cultureInfo))));
});
var sut4 = sut3.ToEncodedString().ReplaceLineEndings().Split(new[] { Environment.NewLine }, StringSplitOptions.None).ToList();

sut4.RemoveRange(sut4.FindIndex(s => s.StartsWith("CompareInfo")), 6);
sut4.RemoveRange(sut4.FindIndex(s => s.StartsWith("CultureTypes")), 1);

var expected = @"LCID: 1030
KeyboardLayoutId: 1030
Name: da-DK
IetfLanguageTag: da-DK
DisplayName: Danish (Denmark)
NativeName: dansk (Danmark)
EnglishName: Danish (Denmark)
TwoLetterISOLanguageName: da
ThreeLetterISOLanguageName: dan
ThreeLetterWindowsLanguageName: DAN
TextInfo:
ANSICodePage: 1252
OEMCodePage: 850
MacCodePage: 10000
EBCDICCodePage: 20277
LCID: 1030
CultureName: da-DK
ListSeparator: ;
IsRightToLeft: false
IsNeutralCulture: false
NumberFormat:
CurrencyDecimalDigits: 2
CurrencyDecimalSeparator: ','
CurrencyGroupSizes:
- 3
NumberGroupSizes:
- 3
PercentGroupSizes:
- 3
CurrencyGroupSeparator: .
CurrencySymbol: kr.
NaNSymbol: NaN
CurrencyNegativePattern: 8
NumberNegativePattern: 1
PercentPositivePattern: 0
PercentNegativePattern: 0
NegativeInfinitySymbol: -∞
NegativeSign: '-'
NumberDecimalDigits: 2
NumberDecimalSeparator: ','
NumberGroupSeparator: .
CurrencyPositivePattern: 3
PositiveInfinitySymbol: ∞
PositiveSign: +
PercentDecimalDigits: 2
PercentDecimalSeparator: ','
PercentGroupSeparator: .
PercentSymbol: '%'
PerMilleSymbol: ‰
NativeDigits:
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
DigitSubstitution: None
DateTimeFormat:
AMDesignator: ''
Calendar:
MinSupportedDateTime: 01-01-0001 00:00:00
MaxSupportedDateTime: 31-12-9999 23:59:59
AlgorithmType: SolarCalendar
CalendarType: Localized
Eras:
- 1
TwoDigitYearMax: {0}
DateSeparator: '-'
FirstDayOfWeek: Monday
CalendarWeekRule: FirstFourDayWeek
FullDateTimePattern: d. MMMM yyyy HH:mm:ss
LongDatePattern: d. MMMM yyyy
LongTimePattern: HH:mm:ss
MonthDayPattern: d. MMMM
PMDesignator: ''
RFC1123Pattern: ddd, dd MMM yyyy HH':'mm':'ss 'GMT'
ShortDatePattern: dd-MM-yyyy
ShortTimePattern: HH:mm
SortableDateTimePattern: yyyy'-'MM'-'dd'T'HH':'mm':'ss
TimeSeparator: ':'
UniversalSortableDateTimePattern: yyyy'-'MM'-'dd HH':'mm':'ss'Z'
YearMonthPattern: MMMM yyyy
AbbreviatedDayNames:
- sø
- ma
- ti
- on
- to
- fr
- lø
ShortestDayNames:
- sø
- ma
- ti
- on
- to
- fr
- lø
DayNames:
- søndag
- mandag
- tirsdag
- onsdag
- torsdag
- fredag
- lørdag
AbbreviatedMonthNames:
- jan
- feb
- mar
- apr
- maj
- jun
- jul
- aug
- sep
- okt
- nov
- dec
- ''
MonthNames:
- januar
- februar
- marts
- april
- maj
- juni
- juli
- august
- september
- oktober
- november
- december
- ''
NativeCalendarName: gregoriansk kalender
AbbreviatedMonthGenitiveNames:
- jan
- feb
- mar
- apr
- maj
- jun
- jul
- aug
- sep
- okt
- nov
- dec
- ''
MonthGenitiveNames:
- januar
- februar
- marts
- april
- maj
- juni
- juli
- august
- september
- oktober
- november
- december
- ''
Calendar:
MinSupportedDateTime: 01-01-0001 00:00:00
MaxSupportedDateTime: 31-12-9999 23:59:59
AlgorithmType: SolarCalendar
CalendarType: Localized
Eras:
- 1
TwoDigitYearMax: {0}
OptionalCalendars:
- MinSupportedDateTime: 01-01-0001 00:00:00
MaxSupportedDateTime: 31-12-9999 23:59:59
AlgorithmType: SolarCalendar
CalendarType: Localized
Eras:
- 1
TwoDigitYearMax: {0}
UseUserOverride: true
";

#if NET8_0_OR_GREATER || NET48_OR_GREATER
expected = string.Format(expected, "2049");
#else
expected = string.Format(expected, "2029");
#endif

#if NET48_OR_GREATER
expected = expected.ReplaceAll("gregoriansk", "Gregoriansk", StringComparison.Ordinal);
#endif

TestOutput.WriteLines(sut4);

Assert.Equal(expected.ReplaceLineEndings().Split(new[] { Environment.NewLine }, StringSplitOptions.None).ToList(), sut4);
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Reduce test complexity and improve robustness

The test is brittle due to exact string matching and complex string manipulation.

Consider these improvements:

  1. Use a more robust comparison approach
  2. Extract platform-specific logic
  3. Use constants for removed sections
 [Fact]
 public void Serialize_ShouldSerializeCultureInfo()
 {
-    var sut2 = _cultureInfo;
-    var sut3 = YamlFormatter.SerializeObject(sut2, o =>
-    {
-        o.Settings.IndentSequences = false;
-        o.Settings.NamingConvention = PascalCaseNamingConvention.Instance;
-        o.Settings.Converters.Add(YamlConverterFactory.Create<DateTime>((writer, dt, _) => writer.WriteValue(dt.ToString(_cultureInfo))));
-    });
-    var sut4 = sut3.ToEncodedString().ReplaceLineEndings().Split(new[] { Environment.NewLine }, StringSplitOptions.None).ToList();
+    // Arrange
+    var culture = _cultureInfo;
+    var formatter = ConfigureFormatter();
 
-    sut4.RemoveRange(sut4.FindIndex(s => s.StartsWith("CompareInfo")), 6);
-    sut4.RemoveRange(sut4.FindIndex(s => s.StartsWith("CultureTypes")), 1);
+    // Act
+    var yaml = YamlFormatter.SerializeObject(culture, formatter)
+        .ToEncodedString();
+    
+    var actualLines = RemoveVolatileSections(yaml);
 
+    // Assert
+    var expectedLines = GetExpectedCultureInfoYaml();
+    AssertYamlEqual(expectedLines, actualLines);
 }

+private static readonly string[] VolatileSections = new[]
+{
+    "CompareInfo",
+    "CultureTypes"
+};
+
+private List<string> RemoveVolatileSections(string yaml)
+{
+    var lines = yaml.ReplaceLineEndings()
+        .Split(new[] { Environment.NewLine }, StringSplitOptions.None)
+        .ToList();
+
+    foreach (var section in VolatileSections)
+    {
+        var index = lines.FindIndex(s => s.StartsWith(section));
+        if (index >= 0)
+        {
+            var count = section == "CompareInfo" ? 6 : 1;
+            lines.RemoveRange(index, count);
+        }
+    }
+
+    return lines;
+}
+
+private void AssertYamlEqual(List<string> expected, List<string> actual)
+{
+    Assert.Equal(expected.Count, actual.Count);
+    for (var i = 0; i < expected.Count; i++)
+    {
+        Assert.Equal(expected[i].Trim(), actual[i].Trim());
+    }
+}

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (1)

Line range hint 73-92: Consider the performance implications of removing dependency caching.

The removal of dependency caching could lead to:

  • Longer build times as dependencies are restored fresh in each run
  • Increased bandwidth usage and costs
  • Higher resource consumption

Consider monitoring the following metrics after this change:

  1. Build duration
  2. Bandwidth usage
  3. Pipeline costs
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e7bdfc0 and 42dec01.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (2)

73-75: LGTM! Clean implementation of dependency restoration.

The new dotnet-restore step is correctly placed before the build step and uses the organization's custom action.


92-92: LGTM! Simplified job dependencies.

The pack job's dependencies have been correctly simplified to only require the build job, which is consistent with the removal of prepare jobs.

Let's verify that all necessary artifacts are still available for the pack job:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the workflow structure and artifacts to ensure completeness.


Artifact flow is properly maintained after dependency simplification

The verification confirms that the build-to-pack artifact flow is correctly maintained:

  1. Build job uploads artifacts with pattern DelayedBuild.{framework}.{configuration}
  2. Pack job downloads all matching artifacts using pattern DelayedBuild.*.${{ matrix.configuration }}
  3. Pack job has access to all required outputs from build job:
    • Version number via needs.build.outputs.version
    • Project list via needs.build.outputs.projects

The simplification of dependencies to only needs: [build] is correct and maintains all necessary artifacts and outputs for the pack job to function properly.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the build job generates all artifacts needed by the pack job
# by checking the artifact upload/download steps in the workflow

# Check if build job uploads all necessary artifacts that pack job downloads
rg -A 5 "uploadBuildArtifact" .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml
rg -A 5 "downloadBuildArtifact" .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml

Length of output: 721


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the full workflow definition to understand job dependencies and artifact handling
cat .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml

# Also check for any matrix configurations that might affect artifacts
rg "matrix\." .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml

Length of output: 4574

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (2)

73-75: Consider adding configuration parameters to dotnet-restore step

The restore step might benefit from explicit configuration parameters such as:

  • verbosity level for better debugging
  • runtime identifier for platform-specific dependencies
       - name: Restore Dependencies
         uses: codebeltnet/dotnet-restore@v2
+        with:
+          verbosity: normal
+          runtime: linux-x64

73-75: Consider performance impact of removing caching

While removing caching simplifies the workflow, it might impact build times for subsequent runs. Consider monitoring build times after this change. If performance degrades significantly, you might want to implement a more targeted caching strategy.

Also applies to: 92-92, 110-112

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42dec01 and f77e739.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (3 hunks)
  • Directory.Packages.props (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Directory.Packages.props (2)

11-11: LGTM! Good move updating to the stable release.

The update from release candidate (9.0.0-rc.1) to stable version (9.0.0) aligns with best practices for production dependencies. This version also maintains consistency with other Codebelt packages in the project.


11-11: Verify compatibility with the new YamlSerializer tests.

Since this package is used by the newly added YamlSerializer tests, let's verify the implementation details and dependencies.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the package version and its usage.


Package version 9.0.0 of Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet is compatible with the YamlSerializer tests

The verification shows that:

  • The YamlSerializer tests are properly implemented in test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/YamlSerializerTest.cs
  • The package is correctly referenced in the required projects
  • All YamlDotNet features used in the tests (NamingConvention, ScalarStyle, SerializeObject) are standard features available in version 9.0.0
  • The implementation follows consistent patterns across the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for YamlSerializer test implementation and related dependencies

# Check for the test file mentioned in the summary
fd -e cs "YamlSerializerTest"

# Look for YamlDotNet usage in test files
rg -l "using.*YamlDotNet" -g "*.cs"

# Check for any potential breaking changes in yaml serialization tests
rg "YamlFormatter|YamlSerializer" -g "*.cs" -A 5

Length of output: 4907


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for YamlDotNet version references and configurations
rg "YamlDotNet" -g "*.props" -g "*.csproj"

# Check for YamlFormatter implementation details
ast-grep --pattern 'class YamlFormatter {
  $$$
}'

# Look for specific YamlDotNet features being used
rg "NamingConvention|ScalarStyle|SerializeObject|DeserializeObject" -g "*.cs" -l

Length of output: 1150

.github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (1)

110-112: Verify project paths consistency

The explicit project paths match the matrix conditions in the build job. However, let's verify that these paths are consistently used across the workflow.

✅ Verification successful

Project paths are consistent and valid

The verification confirms that:

  • Both project files exist in the repository:
    • src/Cuemon.Core.App/Cuemon.Core.App.csproj
    • src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj
  • The paths are consistently referenced across the solution files and project references
  • The glob pattern src/**/ in the workflow correctly matches the actual project locations
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify project paths consistency across the workflow
# Expected: Both build and pack jobs should reference the same projects

# Check for project path references in the workflow file
echo "Project paths in workflow file:"
rg --no-filename "Cuemon\.(Core\.App|Extensions\.Globalization)\.csproj" -A 1 -B 1

# Verify these projects exist in the repository
echo -e "\nVerifying project files exist:"
fd -e csproj -x echo "Found: {}"

Length of output: 7918

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (3)

224-265: Consider refactoring project paths definition to reduce duplication

While the explicit list provides clarity, it duplicates the project paths already defined in the build job's matrix strategy. This could lead to maintenance issues if the lists get out of sync.

Consider:

  1. Moving the project lists to a reusable variable or composite action
  2. Using the build job's output directly if possible
  3. Using glob patterns to automatically detect projects

Example approach using environment files:

 - name: Pack for ${{ matrix.configuration }}
   uses: codebeltnet/dotnet-pack@v2
   with:
     configuration: ${{ matrix.configuration }}
     uploadPackedArtifact: true
     version: ${{ needs.build.outputs.version }}
-    projects: >
-      "src/**/Cuemon.AspNetCore.csproj"
-      # ... (other projects)
+    projects: ${{ needs.build.outputs.projects }}

Line range hint 25-25: Complete the removal of cache-related configurations

The PR objectives mention removing cache-related elements, but several instances remain:

  1. restoreCacheKey outputs in prepare jobs
  2. useRestoreCache and restoreCacheKey parameters in various jobs

Apply these changes to complete the cache removal:

# In prepare_linux job outputs
-  outputs:
-    restoreCacheKey: ${{ steps.dotnet-restore.outputs.restoreCacheKey }}

# In prepare_windows job outputs
-  outputs:
-    restoreCacheKey: ${{ steps.dotnet-restore.outputs.restoreCacheKey }}

# In dotnet-restore steps
   uses: codebeltnet/dotnet-restore@v2
   with:
-    useRestoreCache: true

# In build and test jobs
   with:
-    restoreCacheKey: ${{ needs.prepare_linux.outputs.restoreCacheKey }}

Also applies to: 52-52, 182-182, 416-416


Line range hint 182-187: Consider adding step-level timeouts for long-running operations

While job-level timeouts are set, adding step-level timeouts for long-running operations like builds and tests could help identify and handle specific bottlenecks.

Example for the build step:

- name: Build for ${{ matrix.framework }} (${{ matrix.configuration }})
  uses: codebeltnet/dotnet-build@v2
  timeout-minutes: 10  # Adjust based on typical build duration
  with:
    projects: ${{ steps.projects.outputs.result }}
    configuration: ${{ matrix.configuration }}
    framework: ${{ matrix.framework }}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f77e739 and 4f4945a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1)

Line range hint 9-18: LGTM: Well-structured workflow dispatch configuration

The addition of the configuration input provides good flexibility for manual workflow runs while maintaining a sensible default.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj (1)

Line range hint 14-1205: Consider adding documentation for binary resources.

While the organization of culture-specific resources is good, it would be helpful to add documentation explaining:

  • The purpose and format of these binary files
  • How they are generated/updated
  • Their role in the globalization functionality
test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/YamlSerializerTest.cs (2)

178-185: Refactor common formatter configurations to reduce code duplication

The formatter configurations in this test method are similar to those in Serialize_ShouldSerializeDateFormatInfo. Extracting common configurations into a helper method or a setup function can improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.

Consider creating a method like ConfigureCommonFormatterSettings:

+private Action<YamlFormatterOptions> ConfigureCommonFormatterSettings()
+{
+    return o =>
+    {
+        o.Settings.NamingConvention = PascalCaseNamingConvention.Instance;
+        o.Settings.IndentSequences = false;
+        o.Settings.FormatProvider = _cultureInfo;
+    };
+}

 public void Serialize_ShouldSerializeNumberFormatInfo()
 {
     var sut2 = _cultureInfo;
-    var sut3 = YamlFormatter.SerializeObject(sut2.NumberFormat, o =>
-    {
-        o.Settings.ScalarStyle = ScalarStyle.DoubleQuoted;
-        o.Settings.IndentSequences = false;
-        o.Settings.FormatProvider = _cultureInfo;
-        o.Settings.NamingConvention = PascalCaseNamingConvention.Instance;
-    });
+    var formatter = ConfigureCommonFormatterSettings();
+    // Include ScalarStyle setting specific to this test
+    formatter += o => o.Settings.ScalarStyle = ScalarStyle.DoubleQuoted;
+    var sut3 = YamlFormatter.SerializeObject(sut2.NumberFormat, formatter);

     var sut4 = sut3.ToEncodedString();

190-230: Make test assertions more robust against formatting differences

Directly comparing large YAML strings can make tests brittle due to potential formatting or whitespace differences. Consider parsing the YAML back into an object for comparison or normalizing the strings before assertion to improve test resilience.

For example, you can deserialize the YAML and compare the objects:

 var sut4 = sut3.ToEncodedString();

 TestOutput.WriteLine(sut4);

-Assert.Equal(@"CurrencyDecimalDigits: 2
-... (rest of the YAML string)
-".ReplaceLineEndings(), sut4);
+var expectedYaml = @"CurrencyDecimalDigits: 2
+... (rest of the YAML string)
+".ReplaceLineEndings();
+
+// Deserialize both YAML strings
+var actualObject = YamlFormatter.DeserializeObject<NumberFormatInfo>(sut4);
+var expectedObject = YamlFormatter.DeserializeObject<NumberFormatInfo>(expectedYaml);
+
+// Assert that the objects are equal
+Assert.Equal(expectedObject, actualObject, new NumberFormatInfoComparer());

You would need to implement NumberFormatInfoComparer to compare NumberFormatInfo objects appropriately.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f4945a and 99c629b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj (1 hunks)
  • test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/YamlSerializerTest.cs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj (2)

1206-1210: LGTM! Project references are properly configured.

The addition of IO and Reflection extension references is well-structured and follows .NET project reference conventions.


1203-1205: Verify package version management.

The YamlDotNet package reference doesn't specify a version. Ensure version management is handled through Directory.Packages.props or similar centralized version control.

✅ Verification successful

Package version is properly managed in Directory.Packages.props

The package version for Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet is centrally managed in Directory.Packages.props with version 9.0.0. The omission of the version in the project file is intentional and follows best practices for centralized version management.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for centralized package version management
echo "Checking for Directory.Packages.props..."
fd --type f "Directory.Packages.props"

echo "Checking for other version management files..."
fd --type f ".*props$" --exclude "Directory.Build.*props"

Length of output: 342


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of Directory.Packages.props for YamlDotNet version
echo "Content of Directory.Packages.props:"
cat Directory.Packages.props | grep -A 2 -B 2 "YamlDotNet"

Length of output: 559

Comment on lines +246 to +247
sut4.RemoveRange(sut4.FindIndex(s => s.StartsWith("CompareInfo")), 6);
sut4.RemoveRange(sut4.FindIndex(s => s.StartsWith("CultureTypes")), 1);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Handle potential exceptions when removing list elements

The use of FindIndex may return -1 if the string is not found, and calling RemoveRange with a negative index will throw an ArgumentOutOfRangeException. To ensure robustness, consider adding checks to verify that the index is valid before performing RemoveRange.

Apply this diff to prevent potential exceptions:

 var index = sut4.FindIndex(s => s.StartsWith("CompareInfo"));
-if (index >= 0)
+if (index >= 0)
 {
     sut4.RemoveRange(index, 6);
 }

 index = sut4.FindIndex(s => s.StartsWith("CultureTypes"));
-if (index >= 0)
+if (index >= 0)
 {
     sut4.RemoveRange(index, 1);
 }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (1)

92-92: Consider impact on build performance

The removal of caching in favor of a simpler workflow structure might impact build times. Consider monitoring build durations after this change. If performance degrades significantly, you might want to implement alternative caching strategies that maintain the simplified structure while optimizing build times.

Also applies to: 73-75

src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj (2)

1206-1210: Consider adding version constraints.

The project references don't specify version constraints. While this is often acceptable for internal project references, it's worth considering adding version constraints if these extensions are independently versioned.

Consider adding version constraints if applicable:

  <ItemGroup>
-   <ProjectReference Include="..\Cuemon.Extensions.IO\Cuemon.Extensions.IO.csproj" />
-   <ProjectReference Include="..\Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection\Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection.csproj" />
+   <ProjectReference Include="..\Cuemon.Extensions.IO\Cuemon.Extensions.IO.csproj" Version="[7.0,8.0)" />
+   <ProjectReference Include="..\Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection\Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection.csproj" Version="[7.0,8.0)" />
  </ItemGroup>

1206-1210: Consider documenting dependency requirements.

Given the extensive use of culture-specific resources and the addition of new dependencies, it would be helpful to document the requirements and purpose of these dependencies in the project file.

Add XML comments to document the dependencies:

+ <!-- IO extensions required for YAML serialization -->
  <ItemGroup>
    <ProjectReference Include="..\Cuemon.Extensions.IO\Cuemon.Extensions.IO.csproj" />
+   <!-- Reflection extensions required for type handling in YAML serialization -->
    <ProjectReference Include="..\Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection\Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection.csproj" />
  </ItemGroup>
test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/YamlSerializerTest.cs (2)

1-1: Remove the unnecessary Byte Order Mark (BOM) at the start of the file

The file begins with a Byte Order Mark (BOM), which is unnecessary for UTF-8 encoded files and can cause issues with some compilers and tools. Removing it will enhance compatibility and prevent potential errors.

Apply this diff to remove the BOM:

-using System;
+using System;

175-231: Improve test maintainability by extracting the expected YAML

Hardcoding the expected YAML string within the Serialize_ShouldSerializeNumberFormatInfo test method reduces readability and makes maintenance challenging if the expected output changes. Consider moving the expected YAML to a separate resource file or a constant to enhance maintainability and clarity.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f4945a and 4ff3499.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (3 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1 hunks)
  • src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj (1 hunks)
  • test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/YamlSerializerTest.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (2)

73-75: LGTM: Clean implementation of dependency restoration

The direct integration of dotnet-restore step in the build job simplifies the workflow by eliminating separate prepare jobs while maintaining the necessary dependency restoration functionality.


110-112: Verify project paths consistency

The explicit project paths match those defined in the build job's matrix conditions, but let's verify that these are all the required projects for the package.

✅ Verification successful

Project paths are correctly configured

The project paths in the pack job match exactly with the matrix conditions in the build job:

  • For netstandard2.0, only Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj is built
  • For net8.0 and net9.0, both Cuemon.Core.App.csproj and Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj are built

The workflow file is the only one referencing these projects, and the project files themselves show they are properly structured with their dependencies. The paths are consistent across all stages of the pipeline.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify project dependencies to ensure all required projects are included

# Search for .csproj files that reference the listed projects
rg -l "ProjectReference.*Cuemon\.(Core\.App|Extensions\.Globalization)\.csproj" --type csproj

# List all .csproj files in the src directory for comparison
fd -e csproj . src/

Length of output: 2957


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find project references using ripgrep with XML content
rg -l "<ProjectReference.*Include=.*Cuemon\.Core\.App" src/
rg -l "<ProjectReference.*Include=.*Cuemon\.Extensions\.Globalization" src/

# Also check if these projects are referenced in any solution files
rg -l "Cuemon\.Core\.App\.csproj" src/ -g "*.sln"
rg -l "Cuemon\.Extensions\.Globalization\.csproj" src/ -g "*.sln"

Length of output: 302


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of these project files to understand their dependencies
cat src/Cuemon.Core.App/Cuemon.Core.App.csproj
cat src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj

# Also check if there are any other delayed pipeline configurations
rg -l "delayed-pipelines" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 63829


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the workflow file content to understand the matrix conditions
cat .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml

# Also check if these projects are referenced in any other workflow files
rg -l "Cuemon\.Core\.App\.csproj|Cuemon\.Extensions\.Globalization\.csproj" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 4105

src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj (1)

1206-1209: Verify the necessity of new dependencies.

The addition of IO and Reflection extension dependencies suggests new functionality that may affect the project's architecture. While these are likely needed for the YAML serialization mentioned in the PR objectives, it's important to ensure these dependencies don't introduce unnecessary coupling.

Let's verify the usage of these new dependencies:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can see that the IO and Reflection extensions are actively used in the codebase, particularly in:

  1. CultureInfoExtensions.cs which uses both IO and Reflection extensions
  2. YamlSerializerTest.cs which also uses both extensions
  3. Several test files that validate the functionality

Let's verify the specific usage in the main implementation files:


Let's check the specific YAML-related functionality to understand how these dependencies are used:


Dependencies on IO and Reflection extensions are justified and necessary.

The project references to IO and Reflection extensions are essential for the YAML serialization functionality in CultureInfoExtensions.cs. Specifically:

  1. IO extensions are used for memory stream operations in YAML deserialization
  2. Reflection extensions are used for:
    • Member reflection rules in YAML serialization settings
    • Culture info property handling for NLS (National Language Support)

The dependencies are tightly coupled with the core functionality of culture-specific YAML serialization and don't introduce unnecessary architectural complexity.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of IO and Reflection extensions
echo "Searching for IO extension usages..."
rg -l "using Cuemon.Extensions.IO" --type cs

echo "Searching for Reflection extension usages..."
rg -l "using Cuemon.Extensions.Reflection" --type cs

# Look for specific IO/Reflection related method calls
echo "Searching for specific extension method usages..."
rg "\.(?:Read|Write|GetType|GetProperty)" --type cs

Length of output: 213716


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation details in CultureInfoExtensions.cs
echo "Checking CultureInfoExtensions.cs implementation:"
rg -A 10 "using Cuemon.Extensions.(IO|Reflection)" src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/CultureInfoExtensions.cs

# Look for YAML-related functionality
echo -e "\nChecking YAML-related implementations:"
rg -l "Yaml" src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/

Length of output: 841


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for YAML serialization methods in CultureInfoExtensions
echo "Checking YAML serialization methods:"
rg -A 20 "Yaml" src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/CultureInfoExtensions.cs

# Check if there are any other files that might use these dependencies
echo -e "\nChecking for other potential uses of IO/Reflection in the project:"
rg -l "(Stream|Type|Assembly|Reflection)" src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/

Length of output: 2885

test/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.Tests/YamlSerializerTest.cs (1)

234-448: LGTM

The Serialize_ShouldSerializeCultureInfo test method effectively tests the serialization of culture-specific information. The implementation is thorough and correctly handles the variations based on the .NET version and platform.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (1)

110-112: Consider centralizing project paths definition

While the explicit project paths are clear, they're duplicated between the build and pack jobs. Consider defining these paths as workflow-level variables to improve maintainability.

name: Cuemon CI/CD Pipeline (Delayed)
on:
  pull_request:
    paths-ignore:
      - .codecov/**
+env:
+  STANDARD_PROJECTS: |
+    src/**/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj
+  ADDITIONAL_PROJECTS: |
+    src/**/Cuemon.Core.App.csproj

Then reference these in both the build and pack jobs:

projects: ${{ matrix.framework == 'netstandard2.0' && env.STANDARD_PROJECTS || format('{0}\n{1}', env.STANDARD_PROJECTS, env.ADDITIONAL_PROJECTS) }}
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1)

224-265: Consider reducing duplication of project paths

The explicit listing of project paths in the pack job improves clarity but introduces maintenance overhead as these paths are duplicated from the build job's matrix. Consider:

  1. Moving the project paths to a reusable workflow variable or composite action
  2. Using the build job's output directly to maintain consistency

This would make the workflow more maintainable and less prone to errors when adding new projects.

Example approach:

  pack:
    # ... other configurations ...
    steps:
      # ... other steps ...
      - name: Pack for ${{ matrix.configuration }}
        uses: codebeltnet/dotnet-pack@v2
        with:
          configuration: ${{ matrix.configuration }}
          uploadPackedArtifact: true
          version: ${{ needs.build.outputs.version }}
          restoreCacheKey: ${{ needs.prepare_linux.outputs.restoreCacheKey }}
-          projects: >-
-            src/**/Cuemon.AspNetCore.csproj
-            # ... other projects ...
+          projects: ${{ needs.build.outputs.projects }}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ff3499 and 17db95b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (3 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml (2)

92-92: LGTM! Workflow dependency chain simplified

The simplified dependency chain correctly reflects the removal of prepare jobs while maintaining the required build-before-pack sequence.


73-75: Verify build performance impact after cache removal

While the restore step is correctly implemented, removing dependency caching might increase build times. Consider monitoring build duration metrics after this change.

✅ Verification successful

Restore step implementation is appropriate and consistent with workflow

The codebeltnet/dotnet-restore@v2 action is used consistently within a well-structured workflow that follows a clear build -> pack -> deploy pattern. The removal of caching is intentional and aligns with the workflow's design where:

  1. The restore step is properly positioned before the build step
  2. All dependent actions (git-checkout, install-dotnet, dotnet-build, etc.) are from the same organization
  3. The workflow handles multiple frameworks and configurations appropriately
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare workflow run times before and after cache removal
# Note: Limited to last 10 runs for each period

# Get workflow run times before the PR
gh api -X GET /repos/gimlichael/Cuemon/actions/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml/runs \
  --jq '.workflow_runs[0:10] | map({created_at, updated_at, conclusion, duration: (if .updated_at != null and .created_at != null then ((strptime(.updated_at) - strptime(.created_at)) / 60) else null end)}) | sort_by(.created_at)'

Length of output: 409


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if the dotnet-restore action exists in the marketplace and check its usage pattern
# First, let's check if this action is referenced elsewhere in the codebase
rg -l "codebeltnet/dotnet-restore" --type yaml

# Then, let's examine the workflow file in detail
cat .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml

Length of output: 4016

.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-486: Overall pipeline structure is robust and well-designed

The workflow demonstrates good practices:

  • Comprehensive testing and analysis pipeline
  • Protected deployment with environment gates
  • Proper handling of dependencies between jobs
  • Support for both PR and manual triggers

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.09%. Comparing base (dc4c7c9) to head (25cff63).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #104      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.02%   80.09%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         598      598              
  Lines       18502    18502              
  Branches     1886     1886              
==========================================
+ Hits        14806    14820      +14     
+ Misses       3628     3614      -14     
  Partials       68       68              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (2)

224-265: Consider refactoring to reuse project paths from build job

The explicit listing of projects is good for visibility but introduces duplication with the project paths already defined in the build job's matrix. This could lead to maintenance issues if projects are added or removed.

Consider refactoring to reuse the project paths:

  1. Move the project paths to a reusable workflow variable or composite action
  2. Reference this variable in both build and pack jobs
  3. This will ensure consistency and reduce maintenance overhead

403-409: LGTM! Consider reusing key download step

The download step for cuemon.snk is correctly implemented, but it's duplicated from the SonarCloud job.

Consider creating a reusable composite action for the key download step to reduce duplication and ensure consistent implementation across jobs.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0f39537 and 25cff63.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (2)

340-346: LGTM! Verify secure handling of signing key

The download step for cuemon.snk is properly implemented with secure credential handling.

Let's verify the security configuration:

✅ Verification successful

Security review of signing key handling complete

The signing key (cuemon.snk) is consistently handled with proper security measures across both pipeline files:

  • All instances use secure GCP storage access
  • Credentials are properly managed via secrets (GCP_TOKEN, GCP_BUCKETNAME)
  • No hardcoded paths or direct references to the key content
  • Key is downloaded only when needed for specific build/analysis steps
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential security issues with key handling
# Expected: No direct references to key file in public configurations

# Check for any hardcoded references to snk files
rg -l "\.snk" --type yaml .github/

Length of output: 108


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of both files to see how the .snk file is handled
rg -A 5 -B 5 "\.snk" .github/workflows/delayed-pipelines.yml .github/workflows/pipelines.yml

Length of output: 4358


306-306: LGTM! Verify assembly signing configuration

The conditional assembly signing for Globalization tests is correctly implemented.

Let's verify the assembly signing configuration:

✅ Verification successful

Assembly signing configuration is correctly implemented

The verification confirms that the assembly signing setup is properly configured:

  • Directory.Build.props sets SkipSignAssembly=false by default
  • Assembly signing is enabled when:
    • Running in CI or by main author
    • SkipSignAssembly is false
  • The workflow correctly overrides signing for test projects:
    • Only Globalization tests keep signing enabled (SkipSignAssembly=false)
    • All other test projects skip signing (SkipSignAssembly=true)
  • The signing key (cuemon.snk) is properly downloaded in the workflow before build steps
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for assembly signing configurations across test projects
# Expected: Only Globalization tests should have different signing configuration

# Check for AssemblyInfo files or project files containing signing configurations
rg -l "SignAssembly|AssemblyOriginatorKeyFile" test/

Length of output: 54


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for signing configurations in both test and src directories
# and include csproj files specifically since they often contain signing configs

# Search in csproj files
fd -e csproj . | xargs grep -l "SignAssembly\|AssemblyOriginatorKeyFile"

# Also check for any direct references to the snk file
rg -l "\.snk"

Length of output: 112


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Directory.Build.props file for signing configuration
cat Directory.Build.props

# Also check the workflow file to understand the full context of signing
cat .github/workflows/pipelines.yml

Length of output: 20651

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit 156a296 into main Nov 14, 2024
180 checks passed
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the housekeeping/inherit-test-class-from-yamldotnet-repo branch November 14, 2024 22:20
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants