V9.0.5/service update

[gimlichael]

This pull request includes updates across several files to improve dependency management, update workflows, and enhance Docker configurations. The most important changes involve upgrading dependencies to their latest versions, updating the Dockerfile to use a dynamic versioning approach, and modifying GitHub workflows to use newer versions of reusable workflows.

Dependency Updates:

• Directory.Packages.props: Upgraded Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App to version 10.0.4 and Cuemon.Core to version 9.0.7.
• testenvironments.json: Updated the Docker image for the Ubuntu test runner to gimlichael/ubuntu-testrunner:net8.0.412-9.0.302.
• .nuget/Codebelt.Unitify/PackageReleaseNotes.txt: Added release notes for version 9.0.5, highlighting upgraded dependencies for all supported target frameworks.
• CHANGELOG.md: Added a changelog entry for version 9.0.5, indicating it as a service update focusing on package dependencies.

Workflow Updates:

• .github/workflows/pipelines.yml: Updated the sonarcloud and codeql jobs to use version v2 of their respective reusable workflows. [1] [2]

Docker Configuration Enhancements:

• .docfx/Dockerfile.docfx: Introduced an ARG for NGINX_VERSION to dynamically specify the version (1.29.0-alpine) and updated the FROM statements to use this argument. [1] [2]

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@gimlichael has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 49a207d and 2460309.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)

• .docfx/Dockerfile.docfx (2 hunks)
• .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (2 hunks)
• .nuget/Codebelt.Unitify/PackageReleaseNotes.txt (1 hunks)
• CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
• Directory.Packages.props (1 hunks)
• testenvironments.json (1 hunks)

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.33%. Comparing base (49a207d) to head (2460309).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #10   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.33%   83.33%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines         666      666           
  Branches       51       51           
=======================================
  Hits          555      555           
  Misses        110      110           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
2 Accepted issues

Measures
2 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud