Skip to content

Conversation

@gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Nov 15, 2024

This pull request includes updates to the GitHub Actions workflows to improve their functionality and compatibility. The most important changes include modifying file path patterns in the pipelines.yml file and updating action versions in the scorecard.yml file.

Updates to GitHub Actions workflows:

  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml: Changed the file path pattern for markdown files to use **/*.md instead of **.md for better matching.
  • .github/workflows/scorecard.yml: Updated the ossf/scorecard-action to version v2.4.0 and actions/upload-artifact to version v4 to ensure compatibility with the latest features and improvements.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated markdown file ignoring patterns in CI/CD workflows to include all subdirectory markdown files.
    • Removed ignore rules for the .github/ directory in CI/CD triggers.
    • Upgraded action versions in the scorecard workflow for improved analysis and artifact handling.
    • Maintained the overall structure and logic of workflows without changes to job definitions or execution conditions.

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Nov 15, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to two GitHub Actions workflow files: .github/workflows/pipelines.yml and .github/workflows/scorecard.yml. In the pipelines.yml file, the paths-ignore section was modified to broaden the scope of ignored markdown files and remove the exclusion of the .github/** directory. The scorecard.yml file saw updates to action versions without altering the overall workflow structure or logic.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml Modified paths-ignore to update markdown file patterns and removed .github/** directory exclusion.
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml Updated ossf/scorecard-action from v2 to v2.4.0 and actions/upload-artifact from 4 to v4.

Possibly related PRs

  • 👷 support for OpenSSF Scorecard #23: The changes in the main PR to the .github/workflows/pipelines.yml file regarding the paths-ignore section are related to the workflow file .github/workflows/scorecard.yml introduced in PR 👷 support for OpenSSF Scorecard #23, as both PRs involve modifications to GitHub Actions workflows, specifically in how certain paths are handled in CI/CD triggers.

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code where the workflows play,
Paths ignored, markdowns kept at bay.
Scorecards updated, actions refined,
A smoother pipeline, all neatly aligned.
Hops of joy in the CI flow,
Watch our project flourish and grow! 🌱

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@gimlichael has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 013bdcd and 6317cce.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 013bdcd and 6317cce.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/pipelines.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/scorecard.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/scorecard.yml
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/pipelines.yml (2)

9-9: LGTM: Improved markdown file pattern.

The updated pattern **/*.md follows the more standard glob syntax with explicit path separators, making it more readable and maintainable.

Also applies to: 16-16


Line range hint 4-17: Verify: Removal of .github/** exclusion was intentional.

The removal of .github/** from paths-ignore means that changes to workflow files will now trigger the pipeline. While this can provide better validation of workflow changes, it might also increase the number of pipeline runs.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the workflow file history to better understand the context of this change.


Removal of .github/** exclusion appears to be an intentional change for workflow validation

The git history shows this was a deliberate change where .github/** was removed from paths-ignore along with updating the markdown file pattern from **.md to **/*.md. This change allows the pipeline to run when workflow files are modified, which is a good practice for validating workflow changes before they reach the main branch. The low frequency of workflow-related commits in the action runs suggests this won't cause excessive pipeline executions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the impact of removing .github/** exclusion
# Look for recent workflow runs triggered by workflow file changes

gh api \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  -H "X-GitHub-Api-Version: 2022-11-28" \
  "/repos/codebeltnet/xunit/actions/runs" \
  --jq '.workflow_runs[] | select(.head_commit.message | contains("workflow") or contains("action")) | {id: .id, event: .event, message: .head_commit.message, status: .status, conclusion: .conclusion}' \
  | head -n 10

Length of output: 794


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the git history of the workflow file to see when and why .github/** was removed
git log -p .github/workflows/pipelines.yml | grep -A 10 -B 10 "\.github/\*\*"

Length of output: 1461


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.58%. Comparing base (1e3e307) to head (6317cce).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #24   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.58%   85.58%           
=======================================
  Files          31       31           
  Lines         680      680           
  Branches       84       84           
=======================================
  Hits          582      582           
  Misses         95       95           
  Partials        3        3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit 99230c9 into main Nov 15, 2024
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the ossf/gha-scorecard branch November 15, 2024 19:31
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants