Skip to content

Code graph _analysis_ docs #272

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2025
Merged

Code graph _analysis_ docs #272

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2025

Conversation

howonlee
Copy link
Contributor

@howonlee howonlee commented Apr 8, 2025

We agreed in the private slack to call it code graph analysis everywhere. Or at least, we preliminarily agreed on something of that nature. Putting up the docs here until we agree actually

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new documentation file, docs/integrations/code-graph-analysis.md, which provides an overview of the Code Graph Analysis feature. The document details how the feature maps symbol definitions and references, analyzes commit history to detect frequently changed files, and builds relationship graphs. It also describes the types of contextual information added to code reviews (Definition Files, Reference Files, and Related Files) and lists the programming languages supported by the feature. The feature is available on the Lite tier and above.

Changes

File(s) Modified Change Summary
docs/integrations/code-graph-analysis.md New documentation file introducing the Code Graph Analysis feature. Details include mapping symbol definitions/references, commit history analysis, relationship graphs, supported languages, and review context enhancements.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CodeGraph
    participant Analyzer
    participant ReviewUI

    User->>CodeGraph: Initiate code review process
    CodeGraph->>Analyzer: Analyze code (symbols, commit history)
    Analyzer-->>CodeGraph: Return relationship data
    CodeGraph->>ReviewUI: Enrich review with Definition, Reference, and Related Files
    ReviewUI-->>User: Display enhanced review context
Loading

Suggested reviewers

  • tyaga001
  • aravindputrevu

Poem

I’m a rabbit in the code field, hopping along with glee,
Mapping symbols and commits so cheerfully,
Through graphs of code, I dance and explore,
Adding context and insights from every core,
CodeRabbit brings magic—with a hop and a beat! 🐇✨


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Deploying coderabbit-docs with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 9af3cca
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://e606b179.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://howon-codegraph-docs-2.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/integrations/code-graph-analysis.md (4)

10-14: "What is Code Graph Analysis?" Section Clarity

This section provides a solid introduction to the feature. Note that the sentence beginning on line 12 continues on line 13. Consider ensuring the sentence renders as intended (i.e. merging the lines or confirming markdown formatting) so that it maintains smooth readability in the final output.


15-25: Enhancements Description is Informative

The section "How Code Graph Analysis Enhances Your Reviews" clearly outlines the feature’s benefits using well-structured bullet points. The inclusion of CodeRabbit Chat integration is a good touch. If possible, consider linking to further details or configuration instructions for CodeRabbit Chat to provide additional context to the readers.


36-59: Comprehensive Language Support List

The "Language Support" section lists a wide range of programming languages. The list is comprehensive and clearly formatted.

Note: A static analysis hint flagged a potential duplication issue—likely due to the similarity between "Java" (line 47) and "JavaScript" (line 48). These are distinct languages, but if the static tool misinterprets them as duplicates, consider adding a brief clarifying comment in the documentation (if feasible) or verifying that the list is intentionally comprehensive.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[duplication] ~41-~41: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...de Graph Analysis works with: - Bash - C - C# - C++ - CSS - Elixir - Go - Java - Jav...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)


60-62: Availability Section is Concise

This section clearly states that Code Graph Analysis is available on the Lite tier and above. For additional clarity, you might consider linking to the pricing or features page if that fits with your documentation strategy.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4e3fb7 and 9af3cca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/integrations/code-graph-analysis.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/integrations/code-graph-analysis.md

[duplication] ~41-~41: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...de Graph Analysis works with: - Bash - C - C# - C++ - CSS - Elixir - Go - Java - Jav...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/integrations/code-graph-analysis.md (4)

1-7: Front Matter and Metadata Consistency

The YAML front matter is correctly formatted and clearly defines the document’s metadata. The title, description, and sidebar settings consistently refer to "Code Graph Analysis," aligning with the agreed terminology.


8-9: Clear and Informative Page Heading

The heading “# CodeRabbit Code Graph Analysis” immediately informs the reader about the content of the document. The branding is clear while still emphasizing the feature name.


26-35: Key Features and Contextual Information Description

This section succinctly enumerates the three types of contextual information (Definition Files, Reference Files, and Related Files). The explanation is clear and well-formatted. If there are related examples or extended documentation available, adding a reference might further enhance usability.


64-67: Footer and Further Resources

The closing section provides a useful link to learn more about CodeRabbit's advanced features. It might be beneficial to include additional resource links or a call-to-action if there’s more related documentation.

@howonlee howonlee merged commit 34a2934 into main Apr 8, 2025
4 checks passed
@howonlee howonlee deleted the howon/codegraph-docs-2 branch April 8, 2025 16:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant