Clears bits for mount flags incompatible with remount, Closes #6145 #6525
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ltsai-aig The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
…ers#6145 See containers#6145 See https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/2091424 Signed-off-by: Luke Tsai <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #6145
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/2091424
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
To allow containerized Buildah to run with AppArmor profile
How to verify it
Confine it with an AppArmor profile allowing mount and other calls used by Buildah and run a build.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #6145
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?