libdnf: Bump and disable html and man pages #1463
Conversation
|
If we're bumping libdnf...what about merging projectatomic/libdnf#2 too? |
|
(It's OK if you tell me to just wait until we rebase libdnf...that patch has risk but also definite reward for Fedora today) |
Skip building man pages and HTML docs for our embedded libdnf to speed up builds. This bump also pulls in a fix to ensure we never try to install src packages from `dnf_context_install()`. See: projectatomic/libdnf#3 Update submodule: libdnf
jlebon
force-pushed
the
pr/libdnf-minor-bump
branch
from
a7cc4ce to
6270f0e
Compare
|
I was hesitating a bit because of the additional changes that were made upstream before it was merged. I wanted to make we weren't going to subtly change behaviour again once we do rebase (not that we won't have plenty of other behaviour changes I'm sure). Though looking at it carefully, it seems like that shouldn't be the case. |
Skip building man pages and HTML docs for our embedded libdnf to speed up builds. This bump also pulls in a fix to ensure we never try to install src packages from `dnf_context_install()`. See: projectatomic/libdnf#3 Update submodule: libdnf Closes: #1463 Approved by: cgwalters
Skip building man pages and HTML docs for our embedded libdnf to speed up builds. This bump also pulls in a fix to ensure we never try to install src packages from `dnf_context_install()`. See: projectatomic/libdnf#3 Update submodule: libdnf Closes: #1463 Approved by: cgwalters
|
💔 Test failed - status-atomicjenkins |
|
@rh-atomic-bot retry |
Skip building man pages and HTML docs for our embedded libdnf to speed up builds. This bump also pulls in a fix to ensure we never try to install src packages from `dnf_context_install()`. See: projectatomic/libdnf#3 Update submodule: libdnf Closes: #1463 Approved by: cgwalters
|
@rh-atomic-bot retry |
Skip building man pages and HTML docs for our embedded libdnf to speed up builds. This bump also pulls in a fix to ensure we never try to install src packages from `dnf_context_install()`. See: projectatomic/libdnf#3 Update submodule: libdnf Closes: #1463 Approved by: cgwalters
|
@rh-atomic-bot retry |
Skip building man pages and HTML docs for our embedded libdnf to speed up builds. This bump also pulls in a fix to ensure we never try to install src packages from `dnf_context_install()`. See: projectatomic/libdnf#3 Update submodule: libdnf Closes: #1463 Approved by: cgwalters
|
💔 Test failed - status-atomicjenkins |
We're consistently seeing timeouts on the `f28-compose` test. It's likely due to a performance regression in the backend rather than anything else. I filed a ticket to get an investigation going, though for now at least, let's bump the timeout some more to keep patches flowing.
|
OK, I'm fairly sure at this point that we're experiencing some general I/O degradation. I created a ticket in the relevant tracker, though for the time being I've increased the timeout to get PRs merged. |
Skip building man pages and HTML docs for our embedded libdnf to speed up builds. This bump also pulls in a fix to ensure we never try to install src packages from `dnf_context_install()`. See: projectatomic/libdnf#3 Update submodule: libdnf Closes: #1463 Approved by: jlebon
We're consistently seeing timeouts on the `f28-compose` test. It's likely due to a performance regression in the backend rather than anything else. I filed a ticket to get an investigation going, though for now at least, let's bump the timeout some more to keep patches flowing. Closes: #1463 Approved by: jlebon
|
💔 Test failed - status-atomicjenkins |
|
Ugh man, this time GNOME gitlab 500'ing. That said it's hard to escape the fact that what we really should be doing is maintaining local cache/mirrors of these - gets into the rdgo vs papr style discussions. |
|
@rh-atomic-bot retry |
Skip building man pages and HTML docs for our embedded libdnf to speed up builds. This bump also pulls in a fix to ensure we never try to install src packages from `dnf_context_install()`. See: projectatomic/libdnf#3 Update submodule: libdnf Closes: #1463 Approved by: jlebon
We're consistently seeing timeouts on the `f28-compose` test. It's likely due to a performance regression in the backend rather than anything else. I filed a ticket to get an investigation going, though for now at least, let's bump the timeout some more to keep patches flowing. Closes: #1463 Approved by: jlebon
|
Looks like |
|
💔 Test failed - status-atomicjenkins |
|
@rh-atomic-bot retry |
We're consistently seeing timeouts on the `f28-compose` test. It's likely due to a performance regression in the backend rather than anything else. I filed a ticket to get an investigation going, though for now at least, let's bump the timeout some more to keep patches flowing. Closes: #1463 Approved by: jlebon
|
☀️ Test successful - status-atomicjenkins |
|
One upside to periodic CI outages is that I am unreasonably happy and excited when the commits are flowing again! |
Skip building man pages and HTML docs for our embedded libdnf to speed
up builds.
See: projectatomic/libdnf#3
Update submodule: libdnf