Skip to content

Conversation

niodamian
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

"base_denom": "wei"
},
"png": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cosmos/chain-registry/master/_non-cosmos/bitrock/images/wbrock.png",
"svg": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cosmos/chain-registry/master/_non-cosmos/bitrock/images/wbrock.svg"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove the rock.svg and wbrock.svg uploads since they are somewhat unsightly conversions of PNG to SVG, and aren't really visually identical.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see rock.svg was replaced with a higher quality version, which is good. However the URL for wbrock.svg should now be removed since wbrock.svg was deleted

"provider": "Bitrock Bridge"
}
],
"coingecko_id": "bitrock",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bridged assets cannot share the same coingecko_id as an original asset. If both the original asset and the bridge are from the same team and part of the same project, then the bridged version can be considered an "additional-mintage", instead of a "bridge" asset. Changing the trace "type" to "additional-mintage", and the "provider" to "Bitrock" should allow this to pass while allowing them to share the same coingecko ID

@JeremyParish69 JeremyParish69 marked this pull request as draft September 5, 2025 18:30
@niodamian niodamian closed this Sep 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants