dbt: Improve section here and there

[amotl]

About

Just a bit of copy-editing.

Preview

https://cratedb-guide--288.org.readthedocs.build/integrate/dbt/

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@amotl has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb1e704 and 00c66ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• docs/integrate/dbt/index.md (6 hunks)
• docs/integrate/dbt/tutorial.md (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

Reworks dbt integration documentation: restructures index page with grid-based sections, renamed headings, updated images and introduction, adds a new Notes section, and revises Learn section wording. Applies a minor presentation-only formatting change in the tutorial page using a styled container for the introductory line.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
dbt integration docs reorganization docs/integrate/dbt/index.md	Replaced headings with grid-item layouts, renamed sections, removed inline images in favor of grid-based blocks, expanded intro text, updated Learn section wording, and added a new Notes section with setup link and tested features.
tutorial page formatting tweak docs/integrate/dbt/tutorial.md	Switched an italic intro line to a styled div container without changing content.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Naming things: Simplify directory layout at "Integrate" section #249 — Also updates docs/integrate/dbt/index.md content for the dbt integration page; likely adjacent or follow-up adjustments.

Suggested labels

sanding-180, refactoring, guidance

Suggested reviewers

• karynzv
• kneth
• bmunkholm

Poem

Hop hop, I tidied the docs today,
Turned lists to grids in a tidy array.
Swapped pics for blocks, a Notes burrow too—
Trails are clearer for every crew.
With gentle paws, I fluffed each line,
Now dbt and CrateDB look fine. 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The PR title references dbt and indicates some improvements, so it is related to the changeset, but it is vague and non-descriptive ("here and there") and does not summarize the primary changes (copy‑editing, structural rework of integrate/dbt, section renames, and an added Notes section). A reviewer scanning history would not know the main intent from this title alone. Because the title is generic rather than specific, the check cannot conclusively pass.	Please make the title more specific and focused on scope and primary change; include the docs area and a short summary of the work (for example, "docs(integrate/dbt): copy-edit and reorganize intro, rename sections, add Notes" or "dbt docs: restructure landing page and add Notes"). Use concise phrasing and the repository's PR title conventions so the intent is clear at a glance. Update the title before merging so the project history clearly reflects the change.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	The PR description states "Just a bit of copy-editing" and includes a preview link; this aligns with the raw summary showing copy edits, layout/formatting changes, section renames, and an added Notes section in docs/integrate/dbt. While brief, the description is related to the changeset and therefore satisfies this lenient check. No further detail is required for this pass.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}