[lts86] Switch to unversioned configs

[bmastbergen]

• build-check: Use unversioned config
• configs: Remove kernel-4.18.0-*.config

LE-2786
LE-2787

Note: ./scripts/dummy-tools doesn't exist in this branch, so I didn't switch to that for olddefconfig

[PlaidCat]

Could you change this:

build-check: Use unversioned config 

to

github actions: build-check use unversioned config 

also this is silly but the header check we have is like the following, could you put both commits in to that format.
https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/wiki#commit-message-header
I know we don't have much for our own commits here but we should remain consistent

<commit summary>

<CIQ HEADER, jira number here>

<Commit Body>

Otherwise looks good

[bmastbergen]

Could you change this:

build-check: Use unversioned config 

to

github actions: build-check use unversioned config 

also this is silly but the header check we have is like the following, could you put both commits in to that format. https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/wiki#commit-message-header I know we don't have much for our own commits here but we should remain consistent

<commit summary>

<CIQ HEADER, jira number here>

<Commit Body>

Otherwise looks good

At a former employer the tickets went at the bottom and I keep reverting to that. Some day I'll get it :)

[bmastbergen]

Could you change this:

build-check: Use unversioned config 

to

github actions: build-check use unversioned config 

also this is silly but the header check we have is like the following, could you put both commits in to that format. https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/wiki#commit-message-header I know we don't have much for our own commits here but we should remain consistent

<commit summary>

<CIQ HEADER, jira number here>

<Commit Body>

Otherwise looks good

At a former employer the tickets went at the bottom and I keep reverting to that. Some day I'll get it :)

Commit msgs updated.

[PlaidCat]

[thefossguy-ciq]

🚤