Skip to content

[fips-8] Switch to unversioned configs #223

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

bmastbergen
Copy link
Collaborator

@bmastbergen bmastbergen commented Apr 21, 2025

  • remove demo github action
  • remove push check github action
  • build-check: Use unversioned config
  • configs: Remove kernel-4.18.0-*.config

LE-2786
LE-2787

Note: ./scripts/dummy-tools doesn't exist in this branch, so I didn't switch to that for olddefconfig

@bmastbergen bmastbergen force-pushed the bmastbergen_fips-8-compliant/4.18.0-553.16.1/configs branch from 1d1894a to ce57e0b Compare April 21, 2025 17:37
We run build checks on pull requests now instead of push
LE-2787

These are the configs synced from the corresponding dist-git
LE-2786

Use the remaining unversioned config appropriate for your
architecture (ie kernel-x86_64.config).  These are synced with
the corresponding dist-git config files.
@bmastbergen bmastbergen force-pushed the bmastbergen_fips-8-compliant/4.18.0-553.16.1/configs branch from ce57e0b to 1fa9566 Compare April 21, 2025 17:39
Copy link
Collaborator

@PlaidCat PlaidCat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

Copy link

@thefossguy-ciq thefossguy-ciq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚤

@bmastbergen bmastbergen merged commit 3e5a132 into fips-8-compliant/4.18.0-553.16.1 Apr 22, 2025
3 checks passed
@bmastbergen bmastbergen deleted the bmastbergen_fips-8-compliant/4.18.0-553.16.1/configs branch April 22, 2025 13:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants