-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 323
hevm: london hard fork #688
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
consensus changes look great 💖
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ let | |||
export PATH=${x.pkgs.hevm}/bin:${x.pkgs.jq}/bin:$PATH | |||
${x.pkgs.hevm}/bin/hevm compliance \ | |||
--tests ${ethereum-test-suite x} \ | |||
--skip "(Create2Recursive|Create1000|recursiveCreateReturn|underflowTest|walletRemoveOwnerRemovePending|Return5000|randomStatetest177|loopExp|loopMul)" \ | |||
--skip "(Create2Recursive|Create1000|recursiveCreateReturn|underflowTest|walletRemoveOwnerRemovePending|Return5000|randomStatetest177|loopExp|loopMul|FirstByte)" \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why are we skipping FirstByte
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Those tests do not have a poststate
, just the poststate hash, which we are not deciphering at the moment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we document that as a comment in this file? Would be awesome to have reasons for all the skips here actually, but that doesn't have to be done now.
Do we handle the ropsten issue (https://notes.ethereum.org/@timbeiko/ropsten-postmortem) correctly? I can't figure it out from a quick scan of the code... |
7cc8b6e
to
dda254b
Compare
The seth helpers can be implemented in another pr. I think this is ready for review if ci passes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good!
Still need to update the seth and dapp tooling, but here are the consensus changes