Skip to content

hevm: london hard fork #688

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Aug 5, 2021
Merged

hevm: london hard fork #688

merged 17 commits into from
Aug 5, 2021

Conversation

MrChico
Copy link
Member

@MrChico MrChico commented Jul 2, 2021

Still need to update the seth and dapp tooling, but here are the consensus changes

Copy link
Contributor

@d-xo d-xo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

consensus changes look great 💖

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ let
export PATH=${x.pkgs.hevm}/bin:${x.pkgs.jq}/bin:$PATH
${x.pkgs.hevm}/bin/hevm compliance \
--tests ${ethereum-test-suite x} \
--skip "(Create2Recursive|Create1000|recursiveCreateReturn|underflowTest|walletRemoveOwnerRemovePending|Return5000|randomStatetest177|loopExp|loopMul)" \
--skip "(Create2Recursive|Create1000|recursiveCreateReturn|underflowTest|walletRemoveOwnerRemovePending|Return5000|randomStatetest177|loopExp|loopMul|FirstByte)" \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why are we skipping FirstByte?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Those tests do not have a poststate, just the poststate hash, which we are not deciphering at the moment

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we document that as a comment in this file? Would be awesome to have reasons for all the skips here actually, but that doesn't have to be done now.

@d-xo
Copy link
Contributor

d-xo commented Jul 22, 2021

Do we handle the ropsten issue (https://notes.ethereum.org/@timbeiko/ropsten-postmortem) correctly? I can't figure it out from a quick scan of the code...

@MrChico MrChico force-pushed the london branch 2 times, most recently from 7cc8b6e to dda254b Compare July 28, 2021 18:40
@MrChico
Copy link
Member Author

MrChico commented Aug 4, 2021

The seth helpers can be implemented in another pr. I think this is ready for review if ci passes

@MrChico MrChico marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2021 16:41
Copy link
Contributor

@d-xo d-xo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good!

@MrChico MrChico merged commit a2b96cc into master Aug 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants