Multiselect filtering for "no values" in nblocks column

[BenjaminCharmes]

Closes #1104

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.28%. Comparing base (ccd933c) to head (1b06ef9).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1106   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.28%   70.28%           
=======================================
  Files          63       63           
  Lines        4129     4129           
=======================================
  Hits         2902     2902           
  Misses       1227     1227           

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[cypress]

datalab    Run #3069

Run Properties:   Passed #3069  •  b511e749f8 ℹ️: Merge 1b06ef98cc66ee07a8ebc3c41e66b084341c9a73 into ccd933c60222ee1e124b5409f7f6...

Project	datalab
Branch Review	bc/filter-noblock
Run status	Passed #3069
Run duration	07m 31s
Commit	b511e749f8 ℹ️: Merge 1b06ef98cc66ee07a8ebc3c41e66b084341c9a73 into ccd933c60222ee1e124b5409f7f6...
Committer	Ben Charmes
View all properties for this run ↗︎

---

Test results
Failures	0
Flaky	0
Pending	0
Skipped	0
Passing	477
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

[jdbocarsly]

I haven't tried on this branch, but I was also noticing that "match any" seems to always match samples with 0 blocks. Is that easy to fix?

[ml-evs]

This is doing something a bit strange on my local instance, filtering for "match all" -> "no blocks" still leaves some entries that have blocks. Perhaps relatedly, on main and this PR, if I try to simply sort in ascending order by the blocks column, it starts with the entries with 1 block rather than 0.

[BenjaminCharmes]

Thank for the review @jdbocarsly & @ml-evs !

• For Josh, do you mean with "Math any" and the second dropdown empty ? (With just "any" and no blocks selected ?). If yes, now that we add "No blocks" in the dropdown, I guess it make sense that "Match any" also give sample with no block ? But yes, before, it should only have filter samples with blocks.
• I can't reproduce the first behaviour Matt describes with "match all -> no blocks"
• For the second behaviour you describe, it's probably because the box is empty (and doesn't have ‘0’) when there are no blocks. I can look for a way to change that

I'm going to take a closer look at all this!

[ml-evs]

Realised what is causing this behaviour: when you copy a sample that has blocks, the block is copied identically and then the API summary doesn't include it even though nblocks: 1 -- weird bug we need to fix