feat(katana): allow specifying multiple values w/o wrapping in quotes

[kariy]

Accidentally remove the num_args after I wrote the test for it in #3017 . Now this should be possible:

--slot.paymasters 0x1,0x2 0x3,0x4

without quotes.

@glihm

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated instructions for specifying multiple paymaster accounts by removing the requirement for quotation marks, making it clearer to input multiple values separated by spaces.
• Refactor
  • Improved the command-line argument behavior to naturally accept a variable number of paymaster accounts, streamlining the overall user experience.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Ohayo, sensei! This PR updates the CLI for specifying multiple paymaster accounts in the SlotArgs struct. The documentation now indicates that multiple accounts should be provided as space-separated values instead of requiring double quotes. The argument parsing has been modified—changing from a value_delimiter = ' ' configuration to num_args = 1..—to allow a flexible number of inputs.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
bin/katana/src/cli/init/slot.rs	Updated documentation for paymaster_accounts to allow space-separated entries and revised argument parsing by switching from value_delimiter = ' ' to num_args = 1...

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CLI
    participant SlotArgs
    User->>CLI: Run command with --slot.paymasters "account1 account2 ..."
    CLI->>SlotArgs: Parse paymaster accounts using num_args = 1..
    SlotArgs-->>CLI: Return list of parsed accounts
    CLI-->>User: Process command with provided paymaster accounts

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• fix(katana): ensure paymaster accounts are unique #3017: Addresses management and uniqueness validation for paymaster accounts, directly connecting to these CLI changes.
• feat(katana): initialize slot paymaster account #3014: Introduces new arguments for initializing paymaster accounts in the slot module, complementing the modifications here.

Suggested reviewers

• glihm

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

bin/katana/src/cli/init/slot.rs (2)

23-34: Ohayo sensei! Consider enhancing the documentation with validation rules.

The documentation clearly explains the new format, but it would be helpful to include:

• Valid format for public keys and salts (e.g., hex format, length)
• Error handling behavior for invalid inputs

---

188-190: Ohayo sensei! Consider adding more test cases.

While the current test covers the happy path well, consider adding test cases for:

• Edge cases (empty string, malformed input)
• Maximum number of arguments (if any)
• Invalid hex values

Example test case for invalid input:

#[test]
fn test_parse_invalid_paymaster_args() {
    #[derive(Parser)]
    struct Cli {
        #[arg(long)]
        id: bool,
        #[command(flatten)]
        slot: SlotArgs,
    }

    // Test malformed input
    let result = Cli::parse_from([
        "cli",
        "--id",
        "--slot",
        "--slot.paymasters",
        "invalid",
    ]);
    assert!(result.is_err());

    // Test invalid hex
    let result = Cli::parse_from([
        "cli",
        "--id",
        "--slot",
        "--slot.paymasters",
        "0xZ,0x1",
    ]);
    assert!(result.is_err());
}

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ac52ea6 and ac0db6a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• bin/katana/src/cli/init/slot.rs (2 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

bin/katana/src/cli/init/slot.rs (1)

36-36: LGTM! The argument parsing change looks solid.

The switch to num_args = 1.. elegantly handles both single and multiple paymaster specifications without requiring quotes.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 56.23%. Comparing base (ac52ea6) to head (ac0db6a).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3018      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.24%   56.23%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         436      436              
  Lines       58829    58830       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        33087    33084       -3     
- Misses      25742    25746       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[glihm]

Sorry I've missed that also, better than the quotes. 👍