[sozo] remove double library print

[notV4l]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Streamlined the world inspection display by removing the library resources section. Other key details, such as namespaces, contracts, models, events, and external components, continue to be presented as before.

[coderabbitai]

Ohayo sensei,

Walkthrough

This pull request removes a printing call within the inspect_world function in the bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs file. The removed line was responsible for displaying a libraries table, so the libraries section will no longer appear in the inspection output. The remainder of the function’s output, including namespaces, contracts, models, events, and external contracts, remains unchanged.

Changes

File	Change Summary
bin/sozo/.../inspect.rs	Deleted the call to print_table that printed the libraries display in inspect_world.

Possibly related PRs

• fix: simplify ui for better readability of sozo output #2656: Adjusts output formatting in the inspect.rs file, affecting how resource information (including libraries) is displayed.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6385faf and 6ac023e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• bin/sozo/src/commands/inspect.rs

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)

• GitHub Check: build
• GitHub Check: docs
• GitHub Check: ensure-wasm

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 56.24%. Comparing base (0d4394f) to head (6ac023e).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3021      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.24%   56.24%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         436      436              
  Lines       58829    58828       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        33088    33086       -2     
- Misses      25741    25742       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[glihm]

My bad on that one, thank you @notV4l.