[perf] Test Objects.check performance in Memory implementations - #995
Closed
andreaTP wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
[perf] Test Objects.check performance in Memory implementations#995andreaTP wants to merge 1 commit into
Objects.check performance in Memory implementations#995andreaTP wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Opening in draft just for visibility and probably going to close this.
Objects.checkFromIndexSizeis translated to an intrinsic and should perform the fastest.Sadly, I cannot really measure a consistent speed up on this branch:
shaunsmith/wasm-bench@main...andreaTP:wasm-bench:memory-tests
I might be doing something wrong and my machine is extremely noisy. if anyone want to double check those changes, please, feel free to report the results (e.g. comparing against the 1.5.1 release).