Skip to content

Fix inclusion of internal functions to scheduler#657

Open
awnawab wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
naan-internal-function
Open

Fix inclusion of internal functions to scheduler#657
awnawab wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
naan-internal-function

Conversation

@awnawab
Copy link
Contributor

@awnawab awnawab commented Mar 9, 2026

This PR fixes the logic for including internal functions in the scheduler so that now they are only included upon request.

@awnawab awnawab requested a review from reuterbal March 9, 2026 11:34
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 9, 2026

Documentation for this branch can be viewed at https://sites.ecmwf.int/docs/loki/657/index.html

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 9, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.39%. Comparing base (b711b95) to head (9bfacea).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #657   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.39%   96.39%           
=======================================
  Files         266      266           
  Lines       46418    46419    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        44745    44746    +1     
  Misses       1673     1673           
Flag Coverage Δ
lint_rules 96.40% <ø> (ø)
loki 96.39% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Collaborator

@reuterbal reuterbal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apologies, silly oversight on my end. Thanks for fixing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants