Skip to content

Conversation

@Samirbous
Copy link
Contributor

This detection correlates FortiGate's application control SOCKS events with Elastic Defend network event to identify the source process performing SOCKS traffic. Adversaries may use a connection proxy to direct network traffic between systems or act as an intermediary for network communications to a command and control server to avoid direct connections to their infrastructure.

This detection correlates FortiGate's application control SOCKS events with Elastic Defend network event to identify the
source process performing SOCKS traffic. Adversaries may use a connection proxy to direct network traffic between systems
or act as an intermediary for network communications to a command and control server to avoid direct connections to their
infrastructure.
@Samirbous Samirbous self-assigned this Nov 17, 2025
@Samirbous Samirbous added Rule: New Proposal for new rule Integration: Endpoint Elastic Endpoint Security integration: Fortinet Fortigate labels Nov 17, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Nov 17, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ SOCKS Traffic from an Unusual Process (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Nov 17, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ SOCKS Traffic from an Unusual Process (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Nov 17, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ SOCKS Traffic from an Unusual Process (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR introduces a new detection rule that correlates FortiGate firewall SOCKS traffic events with Elastic Defend network events to identify potentially malicious SOCKS proxy usage by unusual processes. The rule targets adversaries who use SOCKS proxies to obscure command and control communications.

Key Changes:

  • Added a new EQL correlation rule that sequences FortiGate application control events with Endpoint network events
  • Included comprehensive investigation guidance covering process analysis, network connection review, and incident response procedures
  • Mapped the detection to MITRE ATT&CK technique T1090 (Proxy) under the Command and Control tactic

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Nov 17, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ SOCKS Traffic from an Unusual Process (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Nov 17, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ SOCKS Traffic from an Unusual Process (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Nov 18, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ SOCKS Traffic from an Unusual Process (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Nov 18, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ SOCKS Traffic from an Unusual Process (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Nov 18, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ SOCKS Traffic from an Unusual Process (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Nov 18, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ SOCKS Traffic from an Unusual Process (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants