-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BREAKING?] fix(settled, waitUntil): reject with error thrown in run loop #1194
Draft
buschtoens
wants to merge
9
commits into
emberjs:master
Choose a base branch
from
buschtoens:propagate-runloop-errors
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+158
−18
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b25c311
docs(waitUntil): add `options.rejectOnError`
buschtoens c81bbe7
docs(settled): pass `options` to `waitUntil`
buschtoens e0fb14b
refactor(setupOnerror): extract `_getContextForOnError`
buschtoens 4d7fc38
feat(waitUntil): add `options.rejectOnError`
buschtoens 78134c7
test(waitUntil): rejects when run loop throws
buschtoens 4c0b269
feat(settled): pass `options` to `waitUntil`
buschtoens 067ade7
test(settled): it rejects with run loop errors
buschtoens 15e2e54
test(setupRenderingContext): `render` rejects with error thrown insid…
buschtoens 6fb229e
test(click): rejects with error thrown inside the run loop
buschtoens File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not really fond of this, because:
This limitation arises from how
setupOnerror
works internally. Alternatively, we could always instrumentEmber.onerror
in tests, somewhat like:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, letting
rejectOnError
default totrue
will inevitably break a lot of existing test suites, that currently try to emulate this missing feature by usingsetupOnerror
or manually hooking intoEmber.onerror
.However, I believe that ultimately the behavior implemented in this PR is what a user would expect. So while this breaking change may be a pain, because it will require changing all tests dealing with such errors, I think that it's a very welcome change.
Maybe we could even conjur up a codemod to ease the transition. Or we could add a compatibility mode, that will essentially change the order of
notifyInternalOnError
andonErrorOverride
, so that "old" tests just continue to work.We should also consider adding a setter trap for
Ember.onerror
to catch users manually overriding it in tests.A second
next
argument provided toonErrorOverride
, like withregisterWarnHandler
would also be nice: