Skip to content

Conversation

@tedjpoole
Copy link
Contributor

With heavy inspiration from #345

Still need to get utests-bssl-compat & utests-boring building & running.

@tedjpoole tedjpoole force-pushed the bssl-compat-bazel-1.35 branch 6 times, most recently from 51e17c7 to ded0fb4 Compare November 14, 2025 12:19
@tedjpoole tedjpoole changed the title WIP: bssl-compat on bazel 1.35 bssl-compat on bazel 1.35 Nov 17, 2025
@tedjpoole tedjpoole marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2025 09:18
@tedjpoole tedjpoole requested a review from jwendell November 17, 2025 09:18
Copy link
Member

@jwendell jwendell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Ted. It LGTM.

But I'm in favor we land this (and the upcoming change you're working) on 1.36 - or even main if it gets ready soon enough.

Let's try to keep 1.35 "stable".

What do you think?

@tedjpoole
Copy link
Contributor Author

That's fine to not merge this, to keep 1.35 stable.

@tedjpoole tedjpoole marked this pull request as draft November 17, 2025 14:24
tedjpoole and others added 2 commits November 19, 2025 14:53
@tedjpoole tedjpoole force-pushed the bssl-compat-bazel-1.35 branch from ded0fb4 to 1e32043 Compare November 19, 2025 16:05
@tedjpoole tedjpoole force-pushed the bssl-compat-bazel-1.35 branch from 8ccb1f2 to 5344a38 Compare November 20, 2025 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants