Skip to content

Merge GEOMAR stuff finally into release#1456

Open
seb-wahl wants to merge 182 commits intoreleasefrom
geomar_prep_release
Open

Merge GEOMAR stuff finally into release#1456
seb-wahl wants to merge 182 commits intoreleasefrom
geomar_prep_release

Conversation

@seb-wahl
Copy link
Contributor

As requested by @mandresm this morning: The merge request.

seb-wahl and others added 30 commits December 10, 2024 12:17
compiles and starts, but misses (as expected) information in existing
JSBACH restart files. Cold start not yet implemented
links all currently known files correctly
running not yet tested as info from Shradda is still missing
draft version of ECHAM76-LMU that start up correctly
but still fails due to land sea mask mismatch
fixed restart setup in a hacky way (see foci.yaml)
added a new runscript for FOCIOIFS
This should be the only difference between geomar_dev and release that matters
allow different streams for restart and output for ECHAM and JSBACH
with FOCI-MOPS with the 12 tile edition
merge geomar dev into geomar branch
separate echam6 namlist templates for foci and foci_lmu
before merging this branch into geomar_dev
differences where too large for an efficient direct merge
mandresm and others added 19 commits February 19, 2026 18:13
use NRESTS(:) in oifs.yaml (same as release)
…nfused with the forcing filetype, and when forcing filetype was set to link the namelist of fesom was edited in place
…ce and revert the changes from @seb-wahl in src/esm_parser/dict_to_yaml.py
… and bring back a generalized version of that function with support for both launchers. Adds also pytests to check for correctness of the hostfiles produced
@seb-wahl seb-wahl requested a review from mandresm March 23, 2026 11:43
@mandresm
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks a lot @seb-wahl

@mandresm
Copy link
Contributor

The review was done on #1443. This includes some of the changes there. Once this is merge that PR can also be closed.

Copy link
Contributor

@mandresm mandresm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good now :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants