Add support for aeson's fieldLabelModifier and constructorTagModifier #18
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Support (internally) for an extensible
StringModifiertype class which can be used to represent functions for use withfieldLabelModifierandconstructorTagModifierand the type level.Exposes
FieldLabelModifierandConstructorTagModifieras new constructors forAesonOptionalong with some potentially useful combinators inData.Override.Aeson.Options.StringModifier.While users could in theory create their own
StringModifiertypes since this model is extensible, the API for doing so currently exists in anInternalmodule until we've proven this out to be stable enough to be made part of the public API.