Skip to content

Added separate interface for WaitMined #31608

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Whynot63
Copy link

Reason: you don't need CodeAt for it and WaitMined don't use it.

@jwasinger
Copy link
Contributor

Seems okay to me. Was there some specific use-case that motivated this?

@Whynot63
Copy link
Author

there is no specific case right now, but it decrease code coupling

@jwasinger
Copy link
Contributor

Hmmm okay. On second thought, I don't think that there will ever be a situation where a backend contains transaction receipts but not code. So I don't think that adding another interface here enables anything, practically speaking.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants