Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix] Author and Contact Field Values Not Displaying in Dark Scheme #8738

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

samuelmbabhazi
Copy link
Contributor

@samuelmbabhazi samuelmbabhazi commented Jan 20, 2025

PR

Please note: we will close your PR without comment if you do not check the boxes above and provide ALL requested information.


Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Enhanced the layout of the proposal registration form by adding a container wrapper
    • Updated SCSS styles for input elements and integrated Gauzy library overrides
    • Refined component styling without changing core functionality

@samuelmbabhazi samuelmbabhazi self-assigned this Jan 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces structural modifications to the proposal-register component in both HTML and SCSS files. The HTML changes involve adding a <div class="container"> wrapper around existing form rows, which improves the layout organization. In the SCSS file, a new import for _gauzy-overrides is added, and the :host selector is updated with a new mixin call for input appearance. These changes aim to enhance the visual structure and styling of the proposal registration form without altering its core functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/plugins/job-proposal-ui/src/lib/proposal/components/proposal-register/proposal-register.component.html Added <div class="container"> wrapper around existing form rows
packages/plugins/job-proposal-ui/src/lib/proposal/components/proposal-register/proposal-register.component.scss - Imported _gauzy-overrides
- Added input-appearance mixin to :host selector
- Reformatted card-overrides inclusion

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of form redesign,
Containers wrapped with care so fine,
Styles imported, mixins applied,
A UI journey, elegantly styled!
Hop, hop, hooray for clean design! 🎨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c637575 and ff73131.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/plugins/job-proposal-ui/src/lib/proposal/components/proposal-register/proposal-register.component.html (1 hunks)
  • packages/plugins/job-proposal-ui/src/lib/proposal/components/proposal-register/proposal-register.component.scss (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/plugins/job-proposal-ui/src/lib/proposal/components/proposal-register/proposal-register.component.html
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/plugins/job-proposal-ui/src/lib/proposal/components/proposal-register/proposal-register.component.scss (2)

2-2: LGTM! Import addition aligns with the dark scheme fix.

The addition of _gauzy-overrides import is appropriate for addressing the dark scheme visibility issues.


60-65: LGTM! Theme-aware styling implementation.

The changes appropriately address the dark scheme visibility issues by:

  1. Setting theme-aware background colors using CSS variables
  2. Implementing consistent input styling with the input-appearance mixin

Let's verify the theme variables are properly defined:

✅ Verification successful

Theme variables are properly used and consistent with codebase patterns

The CSS variables --gauzy-card-1 and --gauzy-card-2 are extensively used throughout the codebase's theming system, particularly in core UI components for backgrounds and card styling. The implementation in the proposal-register component follows these established patterns correctly.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the theme variables are defined in the theme files
# Look for --gauzy-card-1 and --gauzy-card-2 definitions in theme files

rg --type scss '(--gauzy-card-1|--gauzy-card-2)' -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 89


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for theme variable definitions and usage without file type restriction
echo "=== Searching for gauzy card theme variables ==="
rg "(--gauzy-card-1|--gauzy-card-2)" -l

echo -e "\n=== Searching for theme files ==="
fd "theme|styles|variables" -e scss -e css

echo -e "\n=== Checking root level variable declarations ==="
rg ":root|variables" -A 10 -B 2 | rg -A 10 -B 2 "(--gauzy-card-1|--gauzy-card-2)"

Length of output: 20200


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check specific theme files for variable declarations
echo "=== Checking main theme files for variable declarations ==="
for file in "packages/ui-core/static/styles/themes.scss" "packages/ui-core/static/styles/styles.scss" "apps/gauzy/src/assets/styles/themes.scss"
do
  if [ -f "$file" ]; then
    echo -e "\nChecking $file:"
    rg -A 5 -B 5 "(--gauzy-card-1|--gauzy-card-2)" "$file"
  fi
done

echo -e "\n=== Checking variables in gauzy theme files ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "(--gauzy-card-1|--gauzy-card-2)" "packages/ui-core/static/styles/gauzy/"

Length of output: 7586


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@samuelmbabhazi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Before
Capture d’écran du 2025-01-20 16-24-34

After
Capture d’écran du 2025-01-20 16-23-57

@samuelmbabhazi samuelmbabhazi marked this pull request as ready for review January 20, 2025 14:40
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Jan 20, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit ff73131.

Command Status Duration Result
nx build desktop --base-href ./ ✅ Succeeded 1m 45s View ↗
nx build api -c=production --prod ✅ Succeeded 1m 14s View ↗
nx build desktop-api --output-path=dist/apps/de... ✅ Succeeded 27s View ↗
nx build desktop-ui-lib --configuration=develop... ✅ Succeeded 32s View ↗
nx run api:desktop-api ✅ Succeeded 1m 14s View ↗
nx build plugin-integration-wakatime ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗
nx build desktop-lib ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗
nx build desktop-window ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗
Additional runs (53) ✅ Succeeded ... View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-01-20 15:22:26 UTC

@rahul-rocket rahul-rocket merged commit eed73f3 into develop Jan 21, 2025
17 checks passed
@rahul-rocket rahul-rocket deleted the fix/#8572-dark-scheme-display branch January 21, 2025 07:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Author and Contact Field Values Not Displaying in Dark Scheme
2 participants