Skip to content

chore(evi): refresh @vercel/connect lockfile to 2.4.1 - #792

Open
evlogai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
deps/eve-0.74.0from
deps/connect-2.4.1
Open

evlogai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
deps/eve-0.74.0from
deps/connect-2.4.1

Conversation

@evlogai

@evlogai evlogai Bot commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Stacked on #791 (same lockfile, so it rebases trivially once that lands).

What changed

@vercel/connect 2.4.0 → 2.4.1, the only delta between the published releases (tarball diff):

  • peerDependencies['@auth/core']: >=0.37.0 → >=0.41.3 (devDependency 0.37.4 → 0.41.3).
  • dist/ code byte-identical to 2.4.0.

The range in apps/evi/package.json is written as ^2.4.1 (the previous ^2.3.5 already admitted 2.4.1; pnpm update rewrote it, which keeps the intent explicit). No @auth/core is installed anywhere in this workspace, so the raised peer floor is unmet exactly as it was at 2.4.0: pnpm peers check reports no connect- or auth-related issue, before or after.

The public vercel/vercel mirror froze at 2026-09-08, so the release note for 2.4.1 is not visible; the tarball diff above is the evidence.

Checks

From /workspace/repo on 8cc3469, with the remote cache connected:

  • pnpm peers check: no @vercel/connect or @auth/core findings.
  • pnpm run typecheck: 30/30 tasks successful (0 cached).
  • apps/evi pnpm test: 43 files, 305 tests passed.

No changeset: lockfile plus one dependency range in apps/evi.

ELI5

A dependency the app uses published a tiny patch release that only tightens a recommendation about an optional package the app does not even use; the actual code is unchanged. This pull request just moves the pinned copy to the newest patch and re-runs the tests, which all pass.

2.4.1 raises the @auth/core peer floor to >=0.41.3; no @auth/core is
installed in this workspace (the peer was already unmet at 2.4.0) and the
dist code is byte-identical to 2.4.0, so this is a lockfile-only move
under the existing ^2.3.5-style range, now written as ^2.4.1.
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
evi Ready Ready Preview Oct 8, 2026 7:32am UTC
evlog-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Oct 8, 2026 7:32am UTC
evlog-render-lab Ready Ready Preview Oct 8, 2026 7:32am UTC
evlog-telemetry Ready Ready Preview Oct 8, 2026 7:32am UTC
just-use-evlog Ready Ready Preview Oct 8, 2026 7:32am UTC

Request Review

@evlogai
evlogai Bot requested a review from HugoRCD October 8, 2026 07:26
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 3b42d746-fcc0-4e2c-ace4-203fdefee168

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for following the naming conventions! 🙏

This branch was successfully deployed

5 active deployments
Preview – evlog-docs — 8cc34696 Deployed Oct 8, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – evlog-telemetry — 8cc34696 Deployed Oct 8, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – just-use-evlog — 8cc34696 Deployed Oct 8, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – evlog-render-lab — 8cc34696 Deployed Oct 8, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Preview – evi — 8cc34696 Deployed Oct 8, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants