Skip to content

Conversation

@asukaminato0721
Copy link
Contributor

fix #256

@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the cla signed label Oct 21, 2025
@asukaminato0721 asukaminato0721 marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2025 06:41
Copy link
Contributor

@stroxler stroxler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks right to me

The only question I have is whether there's any risk of confusion on generic types. I don't think so - if I recall, @yangdanny97 just put up a diff that makes sure Generic remains a special form. Cc also @rchen152 who might know more than me about generics and __class_getitem__; the fact that no unit tests broke makes me think this should be good.

@meta-codesync
Copy link

meta-codesync bot commented Oct 21, 2025

@stroxler has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this in D85180587.

Copy link
Contributor

@rchen152 rchen152 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review automatically exported from Phabricator review in Meta.

@meta-codesync
Copy link

meta-codesync bot commented Oct 22, 2025

@stroxler merged this pull request in f6f3238.

@asukaminato0721 asukaminato0721 deleted the 256 branch October 23, 2025 11:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support __class_getitem__

4 participants