Update evaluate-prediction.py to support resuming from previous evaluations

[ohnghb99]

Summary

Modified the evaluate-prediction.py script to support resuming evaluation from where it left off if results already exist. Previously, if evaluation was interrupted, users had to delete the existing result file and start over. Now, the script continues from the next unevaluated sample without reprocessing everything from the beginning.

Motivation

When evaluating prediction results, restarting from the beginning due to interruptions or updates is inefficient. This improvement saves time and computational resources.

Key Changes

• Updated logic to detect and handle existing result files
• Skips already evaluated samples and continues from the next one
• Enables seamless continuation of the evaluation process

Please feel free to let me know if there's anything I should fix or improve. Thanks!

[facebook-github-bot]

Hi @ohnghb99!

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community.

Action Required

In order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks!

[facebook-github-bot]

Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks!